We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare ArcSight Analytics vs. IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature is the log monitoring.""The features I have found most valuable are it capabilities for behavioral analytics and anomaly detection.""The correlation engine is good."

More ArcSight Analytics Pros »

"Most of the features are good. It is an excellent solution.""In terms of the most valuable features, the log collections and log processing mechanisms are good. They have good dashboards.""QRadar shows very effective correlations. If you combine all the logins plus user behavior and the current intelligence, it gives a very good correlation for business. I think it reduces the false positives in user activity monitoring because there is a lot of social information to correlate with other data.""It has a powerful GUI where you can put together your use cases, and don't have to write your own scripts.""I really like the feature we have with the logs, that if there are any credit card numbers being used, like a PII, you can just use rejects and you can mask it. This is a really good feature in QRadar.""The feature that I find the most useful is that IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics is free of charge. It's a fully free product that can be installed on top of IBM QRadar SIEM.""It provides many options for searching. I can see devices from different vendors, like Cisco, in one interface, which is good for me.""Integration is very easy and the reporting is good."

More IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics Pros »

Cons
"ArcSight is not a user-friendly solution and the interface needs to be improved.""ArcSight's features that can be improved include anything related to its visualization capabilities and user friendliness.""It needs more user analytics and aggregation user queries. And it's slow. When you query over ArcSight, it is very slow."

More ArcSight Analytics Cons »

"IMB should reduce the pricing, or reduce some of the features for a more economical solution for the customer.""They have to build more quantitative monitoring, profiling, and make it more predictive.""From a functionality point of view there are issues sometimes.""While the interface is easy to use, it could be a little more responsive.""There should be an extension where we can get the reports. This could be an extension to the dashboard with the Guardian or another product with limited technology, for example IPS. Now, we only have IBM. Basically, it needs more and more integration models.""The user interface and configurability of IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics can be improved. It has a lot of pre-configured settings and not many things can be changed. It also needs more integrations. Currently, User Behavior Analytics is integrated only with IBM QRadar. It could have deeper integrations. It can also have more complicated scoring models. Currently, it has a very simple linear scoring model for users.""We sometimes get an error about the hard drive. Approximately once in two months, we can't find the logs, and they go missing, which is a terrible issue. We are getting support for this issue from our support company.""The dashboard is pathetic and it takes a long time to perform a search."

More IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The price of this solution is a little bit expensive, so if it were cheaper then it would help.""It's free of charge.""The price of this product is high."

More IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Behavior Analytics - UEBA solutions are best for your needs.
542,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The correlation engine is good.
Top Answer: ArcSight's features are starting to get stale. They haven't added any new features in quite a long time. They could add an easier way for a person to customize log sources. It needs more user… more »
Top Answer: We use ArcSight to collect logs from our customers and allocate services.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
474
Comparisons
266
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
320
Rating
6.7
Views
810
Comparisons
530
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
417
Rating
6.7
Comparisons
Also Known As
ArcSight User Behavior Analytics, ArcSight UBA
IBM QRadar UBA, QRadar UBA, QRadar User Behavior Analytics
Learn More
Overview

ArcSight User Behavior Analytics offers enterprises the ability to monitor and detect from internal and external security threats and fraud.

The User Behavior Analytics for QRadar (UBA) app is a tool for detecting insider threats in your organization. It is built on top of the app framework to use existing data in your QRadar to generate new insights around users and risk. UBA adds two major functions to QRadar: risk profiling and unified user identities.

Risk profiling is done by assigning risk to different security use cases. Examples might include simple rules and checks such as bad websites, or more advanced stateful analytics that use machine learning. Risk is assigned to each one depending on the severity and reliability of the incident detected. UBA uses existing event and flow data in your QRadar system to generate these insights and profile risks of users.

Offer
Learn more about ArcSight Analytics
Learn more about IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
University26%
Comms Service Provider20%
Media Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider33%
Computer Software Company21%
Insurance Company11%
Financial Services Firm7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise45%
Large Enterprise45%
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise71%
Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Analytics vs. IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
542,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.

ArcSight Analytics is ranked 16th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 3 reviews while IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics is ranked 8th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 8 reviews. ArcSight Analytics is rated 6.6, while IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of ArcSight Analytics writes "Has good behavioral analytics and anomaly detection features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics writes "Stable and solid security intelligence but lacks some functionalities ". ArcSight Analytics is most compared with Securonix UEBA and Varonis Datalert, whereas IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics is most compared with Splunk User Behavior Analytics, Securonix UEBA, Cynet, LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA and Citrix Analytics. See our ArcSight Analytics vs. IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics report.

See our list of best User Behavior Analytics - UEBA vendors.

We monitor all User Behavior Analytics - UEBA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.