We performed a comparison between ArcSight Analytics and ArcSight Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This solution allows us to identify connections for all users."
"The two most valuable features of this solution are its stability and scalability."
"One of the most valuable features is the alerts."
"The features I have found most valuable are it capabilities for behavioral analytics and anomaly detection."
"This solution makes it easy to create use cases, and it is easy to move queries from use cases to the report to the dashboard."
"The correlation engine is good."
"ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network."
"ArcSight Analytics has improved our system and network policy monitoring."
"We found the correlation engine to be very good. It takes logs from different types of devices and does the correlation in a good way."
"The most valuable feature of ArcSight Intelligence is a single console where the entire dashboard gives all the connected details in a single place."
"The platform helps us improve threat detection capabilities."
"The product has a valuable interface."
"The ability to tailor an environment to suit our specific use cases is a major advantage of ArcSight compared to other logging servers such as Splunk."
"It needs more user analytics and aggregation user queries. And it's slow. When you query over ArcSight, it is very slow."
"There is a GUI, but it is not complete and lacks functionality that needs to be performed using the console."
"Inactive connections from servers, which are upgraded or downgraded within a VM, should be automatically revoked."
"Network integration is very crucial, and you need to have the knowledge to get it done."
"ArcSight's features that can be improved include anything related to its visualization capabilities and user friendliness."
"[There is] complexity in maintaining it and managing it. It's not easy to use. It requires a lot of training."
"The reporting and the way it is worded needs to be improved in future releases. The dashboards are quite poorly designed."
"ArcSight is not a user-friendly solution and the interface needs to be improved."
"The frequency of the updates that we are getting can be improved because the number and types of incidents that are happening at the global level are far more than what we are receiving. The frequency of updates feeds related to our rules should be increased. There should be more frequent information about the new rules that are coming and the global threats that are happening. There should be better options for dashboard creation. At present, the dashboards are good, but there is scope to make them better."
"We haven't found the product fully scalable."
"The dashboard is not user-friendly and is in black and white."
"ArcSight Intelligence's pricing needs improvement."
"ArcSight Intelligence is a bit slower, and its speed should be improved."
ArcSight Analytics is ranked 17th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 15 reviews while ArcSight Intelligence is ranked 15th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 5 reviews. ArcSight Analytics is rated 7.0, while ArcSight Intelligence is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ArcSight Analytics writes "It has improved our system and network policy monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ArcSight Intelligence writes "A user-friendly solution that can be used to integrate the logs properly with different connectors". ArcSight Analytics is most compared with Securonix UEBA, whereas ArcSight Intelligence is most compared with ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM), Microsoft Sentinel, Exabeam Fusion SIEM and Splunk User Behavior Analytics. See our ArcSight Analytics vs. ArcSight Intelligence report.
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.