Compare ArcSight Analytics vs. Microsoft ATA

ArcSight Analytics is ranked 8th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 10 reviews while Microsoft ATA is ranked 9th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 2 reviews. ArcSight Analytics is rated 6.8, while Microsoft ATA is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of ArcSight Analytics writes "A mature and well-regarded cyber security solution for big data, network security, and analytics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft ATA writes "Easy to define rules but interface needs better granularity and only integrates well with other Microsoft solutions". ArcSight Analytics is most compared with Securonix UEBA, Forcepoint UEBA and Microsoft ATA, whereas Microsoft ATA is most compared with Splunk User Behavior Analytics, Varonis Datalert and Exabeam. See our ArcSight Analytics vs. Microsoft ATA report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Analytics vs. Microsoft ATA and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
407,401 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The features I have found most valuable are it capabilities for behavioral analytics and anomaly detection.The most valuable feature is the log monitoring.The ability to correlate different logs is the solution's most valuable feature.Allows multiple integrations with multiple systems in a stable and flexible fashion.This solution allows us to identify connections for all users.This solution makes it easy to create use cases, and it is easy to move queries from use cases to the report to the dashboard.The two most valuable features of this solution are its stability and scalability.One of the most valuable features is the alerts.

Read more »

The solution works well when used with other Microsoft solutions.One of the most valuable features is the ability to report on questionable activity.

Read more »

Cons
ArcSight's features that can be improved include anything related to its visualization capabilities and user friendliness.ArcSight is not a user-friendly solution and the interface needs to be improved.The reporting and the way it is worded needs to be improved in future releases. The dashboards are quite poorly designed.The GUI interface is not always intuitive and easy for non-technical users to work with.The interactive dashboard is complicated and you need to have training in order to use it, so I think that it could be made easier to use.I would like to see integration with automation products, such as Phantom Automation.There is a GUI, but it is not complete and lacks functionality that needs to be performed using the console.I would like to see orchestration.

Read more »

It would be ideal if the interface allowed for more granular configurations. For example, if I were to set a rule that is a deviation from the pre-defined rules in the Microsoft product, there's conflict.Some of the newer features are not completely there yet... For example, there's a tool that allows you to grade your overall internal security and I don't feel that it's completely accurate.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
It can range between $30,000 and $40,000 USD, and can go up to $500,000 and $600,000 USD.In addition to the costs of standard licensing fees, there is the cost of labor for maintenance.The monthly licensing fee is around $20,000. There aren't any costs in addition to the standard licensing fee.ArcSight Analytics is a bit expensive compared with other tools in terms of licensing costs, training, hardware implementation, and support.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Behavior Analytics - UEBA solutions are best for your needs.
407,401 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
479
Comparisons
210
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
411
Avg. Rating
6.8
Views
3,511
Comparisons
1,994
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
427
Avg. Rating
6.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
ArcSight User Behavior Analytics, ArcSight UBAMicrosoft Advanced Threat Analytics
Learn
Micro Focus
Microsoft
Overview

ArcSight User Behavior Analytics offers enterprises the ability to monitor and detect from internal and external security threats and fraud.

Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics (ATA) provides a simple and fast way to understand what is happening within your network by identifying suspicious user and device activity with built-in intelligence and providing clear and relevant threat information on a simple attack timeline. Microsoft ATA is an on-premises platform to help you protect your enterprise from advanced targeted attacks by automatically analyzing, learning, and identifying normal and abnormal entity (user, devices, and resources) behavior. It detects suspicious activities and malicious attacks with behavioral analytics, adapts to the changing nature of cyber-security threats, focuses on what is important with a simple attack timeline and reduces false positive fatigue.
Offer
Learn more about ArcSight Analytics
Learn more about Microsoft ATA
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Turkish Airlines, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Empa, The Alberta Teachers' Association
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company33%
Media Company9%
Recreational Facilities And Services Company8%
Government8%
Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Analytics vs. Microsoft ATA and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
407,401 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all User Behavior Analytics - UEBA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.