We performed a comparison between ArcSight Analytics and Microsoft ATA [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)."The features I have found most valuable are it capabilities for behavioral analytics and anomaly detection."
"This solution allows us to identify connections for all users."
"The solution is easy to implement."
"The correlation engine is good."
"The data collection and the integration with different products are valuable features."
"The most valuable feature is the log monitoring."
"ArcSight Analytics has improved our system and network policy monitoring."
"This solution makes it easy to create use cases, and it is easy to move queries from use cases to the report to the dashboard."
"The stability of the solution is very good."
"One of the most valuable features is the ability to report on questionable activity."
"The solution works well when used with other Microsoft solutions."
"The interactive dashboard is complicated and you need to have training in order to use it, so I think that it could be made easier to use."
"ArcSight is not a user-friendly solution and the interface needs to be improved."
"The GUI interface is not always intuitive and easy for non-technical users to work with."
"It needs more user analytics and aggregation user queries. And it's slow. When you query over ArcSight, it is very slow."
"ArcSight's features that can be improved include anything related to its visualization capabilities and user friendliness."
"The reporting and the way it is worded needs to be improved in future releases. The dashboards are quite poorly designed."
"It's a difficult product to navigate, it's complex."
"The customer service could be improved, and additional integrations with other APIs could be added."
"Some of the newer features are not completely there yet... For example, there's a tool that allows you to grade your overall internal security and I don't feel that it's completely accurate."
"There are occasions where it generates some false positives and you have to embark into figuring it out. You need to find out if it was a true alert or a false positive. It's a little bit cumbersome in that area."
"It would be ideal if the interface allowed for more granular configurations. For example, if I were to set a rule that is a deviation from the pre-defined rules in the Microsoft product, there's conflict."
Earn 20 points
ArcSight Analytics is ranked 17th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 15 reviews while Microsoft ATA [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA). ArcSight Analytics is rated 7.0, while Microsoft ATA [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of ArcSight Analytics writes "It has improved our system and network policy monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft ATA [EOL] writes "Easy to define rules but interface needs better granularity and only integrates well with other Microsoft solutions". ArcSight Analytics is most compared with Securonix UEBA, whereas Microsoft ATA [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
