Compare ArcSight Analytics vs. Microsoft ATA [EOL]
![Microsoft ATA [EOL] Logo](https://itcentralstation-res.cloudinary.com/image/upload/c_scale,f_auto,q_auto,w_80/GqfBeX9zWxZG3rC5hyrUo9Aq.jpeg)
Find out what your peers are saying about Securonix Solutions, Splunk, One Identity and others in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA. Updated: February 2021.
464,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The data collection and the integration with different products are valuable features."
"One of the most valuable features is the alerts."
"The two most valuable features of this solution are its stability and scalability."
"This solution makes it easy to create use cases, and it is easy to move queries from use cases to the report to the dashboard."
"This solution allows us to identify connections for all users."
"Allows multiple integrations with multiple systems in a stable and flexible fashion."
"The ability to correlate different logs is the solution's most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is the log monitoring."
"One of the most valuable features is the ability to report on questionable activity."
"The solution works well when used with other Microsoft solutions."
"The stability of the solution is very good."
Cons
"[There is] complexity in maintaining it and managing it. It's not easy to use. It requires a lot of training."
"I would like to see orchestration."
"It's a difficult product to navigate, it's complex."
"There is a GUI, but it is not complete and lacks functionality that needs to be performed using the console."
"I would like to see integration with automation products, such as Phantom Automation."
"The interactive dashboard is complicated and you need to have training in order to use it, so I think that it could be made easier to use."
"The GUI interface is not always intuitive and easy for non-technical users to work with."
"The reporting and the way it is worded needs to be improved in future releases. The dashboards are quite poorly designed."
"Some of the newer features are not completely there yet... For example, there's a tool that allows you to grade your overall internal security and I don't feel that it's completely accurate."
"It would be ideal if the interface allowed for more granular configurations. For example, if I were to set a rule that is a deviation from the pre-defined rules in the Microsoft product, there's conflict."
"There are occasions where it generates some false positives and you have to embark into figuring it out. You need to find out if it was a true alert or a false positive. It's a little bit cumbersome in that area."
"The monthly licensing fee is around $20,000. There aren't any costs in addition to the standard licensing fee."
"In addition to the costs of standard licensing fees, there is the cost of labor for maintenance."
"It can range between $30,000 and $40,000 USD, and can go up to $500,000 and $600,000 USD."
"I believe we are looking into new licenses. They may be called the E5. Honestly, I don't have it on top of my mind, but I think it's around seven to $10 a user per month."
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Behavior Analytics - UEBA solutions are best for your needs.
464,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Answer: The features I have found most valuable are it capabilities for behavioral analytics and anomaly detection.
Top Answer: ArcSight's features that can be improved include anything related to its visualization capabilities and user-friendliness. The product is complex. The algorithm is not so complex to implement, but… more »
Top Answer: The advice I would give to people who want to use ArcSight is to have patience and use the complete innovations of the tool, don't go by the superficial features. Do a total analytics of the tool to… more »
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Views
582
Comparisons
281
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
397
Rating
6.6
Unranked
In User Behavior Analytics - UEBA
Compared 67% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
ArcSight User Behavior Analytics, ArcSight UBA
Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics
ArcSight User Behavior Analytics offers enterprises the ability to monitor and detect from internal and external security threats and fraud.
Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics (ATA) provides a simple and fast way to understand what is happening within your network by identifying suspicious user and device activity with built-in intelligence and providing clear and relevant threat information on a simple attack timeline. Microsoft ATA is an on-premises platform to help you protect your enterprise from advanced targeted attacks by automatically analyzing, learning, and identifying normal and abnormal entity (user, devices, and resources) behavior. It detects suspicious activities and malicious attacks with behavioral analytics, adapts to the changing nature of cyber-security threats, focuses on what is important with a simple attack timeline and reduces false positive fatigue.
Learn more about ArcSight Analytics
Learn more about Microsoft ATA [EOL]
Information Not Available
Turkish Airlines, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Empa, The Alberta Teachers' Association
No Data Available
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider17%
Government11%
Financial Services Firm7%
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise40%
Large Enterprise50%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Securonix Solutions, Splunk, One Identity and others in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA. Updated: February 2021.
464,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.
ArcSight Analytics is ranked 12th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 9 reviews while Microsoft ATA [EOL] is ranked unranked in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 3 reviews. ArcSight Analytics is rated 6.6, while Microsoft ATA [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of ArcSight Analytics writes "A mature and well-regarded cyber security solution for big data, network security, and analytics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft ATA [EOL] writes "Good integration, simple to maintain, and very stable". ArcSight Analytics is most compared with Securonix UEBA, Varonis Datalert and Aruba IntroSpect, whereas Microsoft ATA [EOL] is most compared with Splunk User Behavior Analytics, Varonis Datalert, Securonix UEBA and Exabeam.
See our list of best User Behavior Analytics - UEBA vendors.
We monitor all User Behavior Analytics - UEBA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.