We performed a comparison between ArcSight Analytics and Microsoft ATA [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)."The data collection and the integration with different products are valuable features."
"This solution makes it easy to create use cases, and it is easy to move queries from use cases to the report to the dashboard."
"The most valuable features are that you get lots of connectors, which make it easy to log in to my ASM, and lots of prebuilt roles from the company."
"The two most valuable features of this solution are its stability and scalability."
"ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network."
"This solution allows us to identify connections for all users."
"The most valuable feature is the log monitoring."
"One of the most valuable features is the alerts."
"The solution works well when used with other Microsoft solutions."
"One of the most valuable features is the ability to report on questionable activity."
"The stability of the solution is very good."
"I faced stability issues with Windows Operating System. The installed connectors hang if they remain idle for a long period of time."
"It's a difficult product to navigate, it's complex."
"Currently, there are no compatible connectors for this solution, which means we have to depend on FlexConnectors."
"[There is] complexity in maintaining it and managing it. It's not easy to use. It requires a lot of training."
"There is a GUI, but it is not complete and lacks functionality that needs to be performed using the console."
"I would like to see integration with automation products, such as Phantom Automation."
"The reporting and the way it is worded needs to be improved in future releases. The dashboards are quite poorly designed."
"Network integration is very crucial, and you need to have the knowledge to get it done."
"It would be ideal if the interface allowed for more granular configurations. For example, if I were to set a rule that is a deviation from the pre-defined rules in the Microsoft product, there's conflict."
"Some of the newer features are not completely there yet... For example, there's a tool that allows you to grade your overall internal security and I don't feel that it's completely accurate."
"There are occasions where it generates some false positives and you have to embark into figuring it out. You need to find out if it was a true alert or a false positive. It's a little bit cumbersome in that area."
Earn 20 points
ArcSight Analytics is ranked 17th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 15 reviews while Microsoft ATA [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA). ArcSight Analytics is rated 7.0, while Microsoft ATA [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of ArcSight Analytics writes "It has improved our system and network policy monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft ATA [EOL] writes "Easy to define rules but interface needs better granularity and only integrates well with other Microsoft solutions". ArcSight Analytics is most compared with Securonix UEBA, whereas Microsoft ATA [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
