Compare ArcSight Analytics vs. One Identity Safeguard

ArcSight Analytics is ranked 8th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 10 reviews while One Identity Safeguard is ranked 3rd in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 14 reviews. ArcSight Analytics is rated 6.8, while One Identity Safeguard is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of ArcSight Analytics writes "A mature and well-regarded cyber security solution for big data, network security, and analytics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of One Identity Safeguard writes "Improved our security posture by making password changes easy and allowing us to make regular password changes to service accounts". ArcSight Analytics is most compared with Securonix UEBA, Forcepoint UEBA and Microsoft ATA, whereas One Identity Safeguard is most compared with CyberArk PAS, BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access and Fudo PAM. See our ArcSight Analytics vs. One Identity Safeguard report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Analytics vs. One Identity Safeguard and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
407,401 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The features I have found most valuable are it capabilities for behavioral analytics and anomaly detection.The most valuable feature is the log monitoring.The ability to correlate different logs is the solution's most valuable feature.Allows multiple integrations with multiple systems in a stable and flexible fashion.This solution allows us to identify connections for all users.This solution makes it easy to create use cases, and it is easy to move queries from use cases to the report to the dashboard.The two most valuable features of this solution are its stability and scalability.One of the most valuable features is the alerts.

Read more »

We use the solution’s Approval Anywhere feature which enables us to add an extra layer of security for critical passwords without adding time-consuming approval processes. By using this platform, if someone goes on a vacation, out of office, or needs urgent/planned leave, then our setup will select the functions tied to that person and automatically delegate them to the next person. That person can start performing that duty based on their access. No sharing of passwords is required.It's one of the best products we've seen. When you start looking at the functionality and use cases and usability of the product, it's straightforward. They designed this product with the end-user in mind, and they also had the sysadmin who is supporting the product in mind. They really did a nice job. Overall, it's a nice product to work with.We are able to log and get reporting on all privileged activity that is being performed. We like the fact that we can leverage the session recording feature, which is especially valuable when we're dealing with third-party vendors that have to remote into our our boxes and servers to do any work on behalf of the bank. Now, we can record everything they are doing to ensure that they're only doing the changes that were needed. In addition, we use it to leverage knowledge transfer with our internal staff.We use the solution’s “transparent mode” feature for privileged sessions. It is very easy because it is only a simple configuration for our users. We don't have to modify our network. We install it, configure it, and it works. So, it is super easy. The rollout for our users is seamless.It has greatly helped improve our security posture. Safeguard has an option where it will reset passwords on service accounts, then go out to those servers where that service account is running as a service and update the password on it. That makes password changes very easy. We can regularly change passwords now and are planning on making it an annual activity, where all the people who own service accounts will go in and make sure all their passwords get changed, updated, and reset.All sessions are audited and they are indexed/searchable through the GUI.The solution's most valuable features are the efficiency and the quality of the recording.The way the solution is installed and deployed is very valuable. They make it very easy.

Read more »

Cons
ArcSight's features that can be improved include anything related to its visualization capabilities and user friendliness.ArcSight is not a user-friendly solution and the interface needs to be improved.The reporting and the way it is worded needs to be improved in future releases. The dashboards are quite poorly designed.The GUI interface is not always intuitive and easy for non-technical users to work with.The interactive dashboard is complicated and you need to have training in order to use it, so I think that it could be made easier to use.I would like to see integration with automation products, such as Phantom Automation.There is a GUI, but it is not complete and lacks functionality that needs to be performed using the console.I would like to see orchestration.

Read more »

The multilanguage functionality does not support the Arabic language, even though this solution is deployed in an Arabic region.From a usability perspective, what we are finding out is that our privileged domain admin users, in particular, want functionality for extending a checkout session. So we are working with One Identity support to see if there's an enhancement that can be made to the product.Some of the out-of-the-box reporting isn't that rich. We spoke to our Safeguard reps who have acknowledged that some of the reporting features can certainly be improved and that we're not the only customer who has cited this. There are very little out-of-the-box reporting capabilities. You have to build the queries and the report. I believe in the next release they're going to be addressing this.The interface is better now, but it still could be improved a lot. It needs more organization, menus, automatic refresh of information, and Web 2.0.Transparent mode was too cumbersome, so I don't foresee us being able to use it. On paper when we were initially talking about it, it was definitely going to be the preferred method until we realized the burden it would be on our network guys. Then, we had to step back and reevaluate what we wanted to do. That's when we changed our approach to use the RD Gateway feature.Monitoring of the platform should be easier and more functional so that you can have a clear picture of the running service.I would like to see an adjustment with more enterprise architecture. You can buy multiple appliances but you can not fully separate different functions, so scaling might be a bit more complicated.Our experience with technical support has been disappointing. We require more prompt and faster response times. We require answers to our questions right away but we haven't received that level of support.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
It can range between $30,000 and $40,000 USD, and can go up to $500,000 and $600,000 USD.In addition to the costs of standard licensing fees, there is the cost of labor for maintenance.The monthly licensing fee is around $20,000. There aren't any costs in addition to the standard licensing fee.ArcSight Analytics is a bit expensive compared with other tools in terms of licensing costs, training, hardware implementation, and support.

Read more »

We have a yearly license. The cost depends on how much a company wants to invest in technology. In our organization, we believe in modern digitization and automation processes so we found it affordable. One Identity was not that much less than other solutions and it is not a cheap solution. There were number of cheaper solutions. However, it's the most effective, according to our evaluation.It was definitely cheaper than the other two products that we evaluated.Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis.It is a bit on the pricey side, but you get what you pay for. You don't want to get anything too cheap because then you get cheap stuff and cheap support. That really never helps anybody.The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible.Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Behavior Analytics - UEBA solutions are best for your needs.
407,401 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
479
Comparisons
210
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
411
Avg. Rating
6.8
Views
2,935
Comparisons
1,254
Reviews
14
Average Words per Review
936
Avg. Rating
8.4
Top Comparisons
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
ArcSight User Behavior Analytics, ArcSight UBA
Learn
Micro Focus
One Identity
Overview

ArcSight User Behavior Analytics offers enterprises the ability to monitor and detect from internal and external security threats and fraud.

One Identity Safeguard securely stores, manages, records and analyzes privileged accounts and access. It is an integrated solution that combines a secure hardened password safe and a session management and monitoring solution with threat detection and analytics.

Offer
Learn more about ArcSight Analytics
Securely store, manage, record and analyze privileged access

Prevent security breaches and limit damage by putting in place a privileged access management solution. Get a free 45-day trial, or request a demo of One Identity SafeGuard.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Cavium
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm71%
University14%
Manufacturing Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm30%
Software R&D Company28%
Comms Service Provider14%
Real Estate/Law Firm5%
Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Analytics vs. One Identity Safeguard and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
407,401 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all User Behavior Analytics - UEBA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.