We performed a comparison between ArcSight Analytics and One Identity Safeguard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The data collection and the integration with different products are valuable features."
"The correlation engine is good."
"Less resource consumption in terms of memory and processing."
"ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network."
"ArcSight Analytics has improved our system and network policy monitoring."
"One of the most valuable features is the alerts."
"The solution is easy to implement."
"Allows multiple integrations with multiple systems in a stable and flexible fashion."
"One Identity Safeguard is stable and provides great performance."
"Safeguard has the ability to record and retrieve in the full-video format."
"Being able to use a proxy server is an advantage."
"The technical support is tremendous."
"The transparent mode for privileged sessions is one of the best things for customers, because they don't see the system in-between."
"It's one of the best products we've seen. When you start looking at the functionality and use cases and usability of the product, it's straightforward. They designed this product with the end-user in mind, and they also had the sysadmin who is supporting the product in mind. They really did a nice job. Overall, it's a nice product to work with."
"The monitoring system is very good."
"We use the solution’s Approval Anywhere feature which enables us to add an extra layer of security for critical passwords without adding time-consuming approval processes. By using this platform, if someone goes on a vacation, out of office, or needs urgent/planned leave, then our setup will select the functions tied to that person and automatically delegate them to the next person. That person can start performing that duty based on their access. No sharing of passwords is required."
"It needs more user analytics and aggregation user queries. And it's slow. When you query over ArcSight, it is very slow."
"The GUI interface is not always intuitive and easy for non-technical users to work with."
"Currently, there are no compatible connectors for this solution, which means we have to depend on FlexConnectors."
"ArcSight is not a user-friendly solution and the interface needs to be improved."
"The reporting and the way it is worded needs to be improved in future releases. The dashboards are quite poorly designed."
"I faced stability issues with Windows Operating System. The installed connectors hang if they remain idle for a long period of time."
"There is a GUI, but it is not complete and lacks functionality that needs to be performed using the console."
"[There is] complexity in maintaining it and managing it. It's not easy to use. It requires a lot of training."
"The SPS could be a lot easier to administrate and the parts should be unified, from a design perspective, so that I can recognize the systems as being part of the same package. They feel like they have been forced together."
"I would like to see an adjustment with more enterprise architecture. You can buy multiple appliances but you can not fully separate different functions, so scaling might be a bit more complicated."
"Even though we have two nodes, there's no way to do an upgrade without taking everything completely offline. It would be nice if they could improve that."
"For some users, the physical appliance has been a bit buggy."
"The multilanguage functionality does not support the Arabic language, even though this solution is deployed in an Arabic region."
"The product uses a lot of resources in current sessions."
"We would like to have the option of importing assets by using the CSV file. It was available in the earlier versions, but it is not available now."
"The deployment affects our privileged users because it takes a long time for them to request privileges, which impacts the SLA."
ArcSight Analytics is ranked 17th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 15 reviews while One Identity Safeguard is ranked 6th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 38 reviews. ArcSight Analytics is rated 7.0, while One Identity Safeguard is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ArcSight Analytics writes "It has improved our system and network policy monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of One Identity Safeguard writes "Provides us with centralized storage of secrets and credentials, and visibility into the use of privileged access". ArcSight Analytics is most compared with Securonix UEBA, whereas One Identity Safeguard is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, WALLIX Bastion, Delinea Secret Server, BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access and Fudo PAM. See our ArcSight Analytics vs. One Identity Safeguard report.
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.