Anonymous UserSVP Insider Threat at a financial services firm
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The two most valuable features of this solution are its stability and scalability."
"This solution makes it easy to create use cases, and it is easy to move queries from use cases to the report to the dashboard."
"This solution allows us to identify connections for all users."
"Allows multiple integrations with multiple systems in a stable and flexible fashion."
"The ability to correlate different logs is the solution's most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is the log monitoring."
"The features I have found most valuable are it capabilities for behavioral analytics and anomaly detection."
"What I like most is that the threat models and risk scoring are very accurate and very helpful to the analysts on my team. They help highlight the most important things for them to look at."
"The second feature is that within the SNYPR product there is a functionality called Spotter. We use that for link analysis diagrams and to run the stats command. That's extremely useful because it replaces a tedious, manual process we used to use, using Microsoft Excel and a couple of other methods, to bring data together."
"The customizability of the tool is valuable. We are able to customize the use cases and create them easily without a large amount of Securonix assistance. It's very flexible. We do not have to rely on Professional Services to modify or create a new use case."
"The feature that is most valuable is the fact that it's an open platform, so it allows us to modify policies and tune policies as needed. There's also a feature called Data Insights which allows us to create different dashboards on specific things of interest for us."
"The machine-learning algorithms are the most valuable feature because they're able to identify the 'needle in the haystack.'"
"When we were looking for products for our security monitoring needs, our biggest requirement was that we wanted something based on machine-learning and analytics. If you go with rules, it can raise a lot of noise. Securonix, with its UEBA capability, had the best analytics use-cases."
"One of the most valuable features it has is the thread chaining. One of the common issues that we always had was the number of anomalies that we used to get and the number of alerts that we used to get. But with this approach of thread chaining, we've found the false-positive rate has decreased very significantly. That was something that we never could have achieved before."
"The most valuable feature is being able to look at users' behavioral profiles to see what they typically access. One of the key events that we monitor is people's downloading of objects... It's very easy to see people's patterns, what they typically do."
"There is a GUI, but it is not complete and lacks functionality that needs to be performed using the console."
"I would like to see integration with automation products, such as Phantom Automation."
"The interactive dashboard is complicated and you need to have training in order to use it, so I think that it could be made easier to use."
"The GUI interface is not always intuitive and easy for non-technical users to work with."
"The reporting and the way it is worded needs to be improved in future releases. The dashboards are quite poorly designed."
"ArcSight is not a user-friendly solution and the interface needs to be improved."
"ArcSight's features that can be improved include anything related to its visualization capabilities and user friendliness."
"A helpful feature would be an event export. A way to create more substantial summary reports would be nice."
"Other than issues with the training, there have been issues with the encryption. There have also been issues with some of the reporting, minor glitches that they have fixed as they've gone along."
"Securonix implements risk scores based on different policies that are triggered. We've seen some challenges with the risk scores and how they trigger. These are things that Securonix has recognized and they've been working with us to help improve things."
"There is room for improvement in the product's integration with ServiceNow and in the reporting features."
"We have compliance needs. We have investigation needs. And we have situations where an analyst needs to look at threats. These three things require a different view of how they look at the threats. What would be good is to have Securonix create three different views of their Security Command Center so that, depending on the persona of the person logging in, they'd get the relevant data they need and not see everything."
"One of the things they can improve on a little bit is the usability side, to make some things simpler... The tool does have a lot of knobs, you can turn a lot of things on and off and you can change things. Sometimes, it can become a little overwhelming. They should remove some confirmation options and make it simpler for the less mature customers and people who are still trying to grasp it."
"We have a lot of users who, because they're engineers and they're bringing down product data - where, at times, a top-level product could be 10,000 or 15,000 objects - it's difficult for us to determine what should be a concern and what shouldn't be a concern. We work with the Securonix folks to try to come up with better ways to identify that."
"The pricing. I'm not sure how they are proceeding with the identity based pricing compared with DB pricing which most of the vendors are using today."
"It can range between $30,000 and $40,000 USD, and can go up to $500,000 and $600,000 USD."
"We have an annual license. We pay $200,000 for the base licensing and we pay another $50,000 for the software as a service."
"A good thing about Securonix is that they don't charge by volume of data or number of devices... They charge by the number of employees, which is a much more predictable number for me, versus data. Our costs are in the $100,000 range over a three-year subscription."
"We have a license from our 5.0, so that license just continued. We paid them the extra cloud-hosting costs for a year which were about $300,000."
"We went in on a three-year agreement which has an annual licensing fee, based upon the number of people that we're monitoring. There have not been any additional costs to the standard licensing fees."
Earn 20 points
ArcSight User Behavior Analytics offers enterprises the ability to monitor and detect from internal and external security threats and fraud.
SNYPR is a next-generation security analytics platform that transforms big data into actionable security intelligence. Built on a Hadoop big data security lake, SNYPR combines an open data model, log management, security incident and event management (SIEM), user and entity behavior analytics (UEBA) and fraud detection into a complete, end-to-end platform that can be deployed in its entirety or in flexible, modular components.
ArcSight Analytics is ranked 9th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 7 reviews while Securonix Security Analytics is ranked 1st in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 10 reviews. ArcSight Analytics is rated 7.4, while Securonix Security Analytics is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of ArcSight Analytics writes "A mature and well-regarded cyber security solution for big data, network security, and analytics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Securonix Security Analytics writes "Spotter tool has helped us eliminate many hours required to manually create link analysis diagrams". ArcSight Analytics is most compared with Securonix UEBA and Varonis Datalert, whereas Securonix Security Analytics is most compared with Splunk, Exabeam, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm NextGen SIEM and Splunk User Behavior Analytics. See our ArcSight Analytics vs. Securonix Security Analytics report.
See our list of best User Behavior Analytics - UEBA vendors.
We monitor all User Behavior Analytics - UEBA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.