Compare ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs. Elastic SIEM

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
JayGrant
Researched ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) but chose Devo: We can build Activeboards that can do queries across multiple different types of data sources with one query
Being able to build and modify dashboards on the fly with Activeboards streamlines my analyst time because my analysts aren't doing it across... Read more »
Utkarsh Srivastava
Good visibility into end-to-end communications helps discover security threats
ArcSight gives us better visibility into threats that were unknown earlier. We now have an ability to assess end-to-end communications, as well as... Read more »
Use Elastic SIEM? Share your opinion.
Free Report: ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs. Elastic SIEM
Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs. Elastic SIEM and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
Download now
455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Being able to build and modify dashboards on the fly with Activeboards streamlines my analyst time because my analysts aren't doing it across spreadsheets or five different tools to try to build a timeline out themselves. They can just ingest it all, build a timeline out across all the logging, and all the different information sources in one dashboard. So, it's a huge time saver. It also has the accuracy of being able to look at all those data sources in one view. The log analysis, which would take 40 hours, we can probably get through it in about five to eight hours using Devo.""Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of the user interface. The UI has a graphically interface with the raw data in a table. The table can be as big as you want it, depending on your use case. You can easily get a report combining your data, along with calculations and graphical dashboards. You don't need a lot of training, because the UI is relatively very intuitive.""The ability to have high performance, high-speed search capability is incredibly important for us. When it comes to doing security analysis, you don't want to be doing is sitting around waiting to get data back while an attacker is sitting on a network, actively attacking it. You need to be able to answer questions quickly. If I see an indicator of attack, I need to be able to rapidly pivot and find data, then analyze it and find more data to answer more questions. You need to be able to do that quickly. If I'm sitting around just waiting to get my first response, then it ends up moving too slow to keep up with the attacker. Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events.""The real-time analytics of security-related data are super. There are a lot of data feeds going into it and it's very quick at pulling up and correlating the data and showing you what's going on in your infrastructure. It's fast. The way that their architecture and technology works, they've really focused on the speed of query results and making sure that we can do what we need to do quickly. Devo is pulling back information in a fast fashion, based on real-time events.""The user interface is really modern. As an end-user, there are a lot of possibilities to tailor the platform to your needs, and that can be done without needing much support from Devo. It's really flexible and modular. The UI is very clean.""One of the biggest features of the UI is that you see the actual code of what you're doing in the graphical user interface, in a little window on the side. Whatever you're doing, you see the code, what's happening. And you can really quickly switch between using the GUI and using the code. That's really useful."

More Devo Pros »

"The webpage algorithm is the most valuable feature because it was the fastest feature for searching the logs, events, and correlation.""We do consulting and I get feedback from our clients that the product really helped them with compliance, especially with GDPR.""When WannaCry attacks I can minimize the damage. My company had no protection at the time. We get alerts in ArcSight and then whenever a user got a copy of WannaCry and the WannaCry malware wants to connect to the mother ship, it alerts me in the ArcSight dashboard, and that helps us a lot. We then just go to the user and erase the malware.""This process has helped to improve our organization because we have centralized the intra-group security equipment logs.""I think that the overall experience with this solution is good, but in particular, I think that the dashboards are quite interactive.""For the typical malware or intrusion, this solution assists us by identifying the symptoms based on network traffic from the application servers.""ArcSight gives us better visibility into threats that were unknown earlier.""The product is quite mature. It's been around for a long time."

More ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the machine learning capability.""The performance is good and it is faster than IBM QRadar.""The most valuable features are the speed, detail, and visualization. It has the latest standards.""The most valuable feature is the speed, as it responds in a very short time.""Just the ability to do a lot more than just up-down is nice, which a lot of people take for granted."

More Elastic SIEM Pros »

Cons
"Their documentation could be better. They are growing quickly and need to have someone focused on tech writing to ensure that all the different updates, how to use them, and all the new features and functionality are properly documented.""There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the machine data simpler.""There is room for improvement in the ability to parse different log types. The breadth of overall log parsers that exists right now is an area that they could improve. Natively, there's more that could be done by Devo then what it can and can't understand from a parsing perspective.""Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there. They've got good integrations with the public cloud, but there are a lot of cloud SaaS systems that they still need to work with on integrations, such as Salesforce and other SaaS providers where we need to get access logs.""The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel. Its functionality is mature, but the look and feel is not there. For example, if you have some data sets and are trying to get some graphics, you cannot change anything. There's just one format for the graphics. You cannot change the size of the font, the font itself, etc."

More Devo Cons »

"The security area has room for improvement.""I would like for them to integrate mobile devices. Integration or any kind of functionality which will act as a substitute for IBM so that we can really track our mobile devices as well as look at SIEM.""In other products, I have found that they use some kind of GUI that is drag and drop. While in ArcSight they use still scripting. They should keep scripting because some people prefer scripting but they should have the option for those who prefer using drag and drop.""There are several improvements that we would like to see, including: Building a system based on a log collection (SOC), a scenario for external encroachment, and Operator training.""It would be nice if the interface were more user-friendly, with, for example, a minimal number of tabs to navigate.""The weakness in this system comes about because, with so many different logs, it is possible that the security analyst will lose information.""We would like the ability to easily identify either unused resources or those that are being used sub-optimally.""The biggest requirement is that there is no cloud solution for this product yet. They need to create a cloud version. It's the biggest thing they can do to make the solution better."

More ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) Cons »

"This solution is very hard to implement.""The interface could be more user friendly because it is sometimes hard to deal with.""If you compare this with CrowdStrike or Carbon Black, they can improve.""The training that is offered for Elastic is in need of improvement because there is no depth to it.""The biggest challenge has been related to the implementation."

More Elastic SIEM Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less.""We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom.""We have seen ROI. We have seen cost savings in maintenance, upkeep, and support.""I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

More Devo Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The pricing is great compared to others.""The cost of the solution is not very high, although hiring a qualified analyst to work with the product is expensive.""It's a good price, it's one of the cheaper solutions."

More ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) Pricing and Cost Advice »

"There is no charge for using the open-source version.""It's a monthly cost with Elastic SIEM, but I am not sure of the exact cost."

More Elastic SIEM Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
See Which Vendors Are Best For You
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
See Recommendations
455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
What do you like most about Devo?
Top Answer: Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of… more »
Read all 3 answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?
Top Answer: We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the… more »
Read all 3 answers
What needs improvement with Devo?
Top Answer: There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the… more »
Read all 3 answers
Which is the best SIEM tool for a mid-sized financial services firm: Arcsight or Securonix?
Top Answer: In my market, a lot of financial companies had or have an ArcSight installation. Just because in former times it was… more »
Read all 9 answers
What do you like most about ArcSight?
Top Answer: ArcSight gives us better visibility into threats that were unknown earlier.
Read all 7 answers
What needs improvement with ArcSight?
Top Answer: The following needs to be improved: * We would like the ability to easily identify either unused resources or those that… more »
Read all 7 answers
What do you like most about Elastic SIEM?
Top Answer: The most valuable features are the speed, detail, and visualization. It has the latest standards.
Read all 3 answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic SIEM?
Top Answer: There is no charge for using the open-source version.
What needs improvement with Elastic SIEM?
Top Answer: The signature security needs improvement. If you compare this with CrowdStrike or Carbon Black, they can improve.
Read all 3 answers
Popular Comparisons
Splunk vs. Devo
Compared 54% of the time.
LogRhythm NextGen SIEM vs. Devo
Compared 18% of the time.
ELK Logstash vs. Devo
Compared 9% of the time.
IBM QRadar vs. Devo
Compared 4% of the time.
Datadog vs. Devo
Compared 1% of the time.
+ Add more products to compare
+ Add more products to compare
Splunk vs. Elastic SIEM
Compared 35% of the time.
Fortinet FortiSIEM vs. Elastic SIEM
Compared 12% of the time.
AlienVault OSSIM vs. Elastic SIEM
Compared 11% of the time.
IBM QRadar vs. Elastic SIEM
Compared 10% of the time.
+ Add more products to compare
Also Known As
LogtrustMicro Focus ArcSight, HPE ArcSight, ArcSight
Learn
Devo
Micro Focus
Elastic
Overview

Devo, the cloud-native logging and security analytics company, empowers security and operations teams to maximize the value of all their data. Only the Devo platform delivers the powerful combination of real-time visibility, high-performance analytics, scalability, multitenancy, and low TCO crucial for monitoring and securing business operations as enterprises accelerate their shift to the cloud.

ArcSight is Micro Focus' leading Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solution. ArcSight helps businesses protect their data through compliance solutions and security analytics.

There are a number of different products and solutions in the ArcSight family so you are able to pick and choose those that are best suited to your business requirements.

With ArcSight, IT can:

  • Monitor IT infrastructure.
  • Manage insider security with secure identity and access control.
  • Automate compliance.
  • Monitor applications.
  • Manage security risks.
  • Identify APTs.

Elastic SIEM equips security practitioners with easy data ingestion via Beats, shareable analytics based on the Elastic Common Schema (ECS), and the ability to interact with security data using the SIEM app in Kibana. As threats continue to evolve, so too will Elastic SIEM.

Offer
See Devo in Action
Watch a Demo

See how Devo allows you to free yourself from data management, and make machine data and insights accessible.

Learn more about ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)
Learn More
Learn more about Elastic SIEM
Learn More
Sample Customers
United States Air Force, Rubrik, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenTextLake Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa, and Obrela. Harel Insurance & Financial, Delhivery, Voxpopme, POSCO, Fairfax Media, EO Media Group, Netshoes, BPCE, MM Karton, KPN, NS1, Ctcue, Forcura, Engadget, Roanoke College, St. Mary's University, ndiana University, E*Trade, Adobe, Cisco
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider24%
Financial Services Firm6%
Government6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm37%
Comms Service Provider22%
Computer Software Company11%
Insurance Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider19%
Government8%
Financial Services Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider26%
Media Company6%
Insurance Company6%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business41%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise41%
REVIEWERS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise63%
No Data Available
Free Report: ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs. Elastic SIEM
Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs. Elastic SIEM and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
Download now
455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.

ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is ranked 9th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 14 reviews while Elastic SIEM is ranked 13th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 5 reviews. ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is rated 7.2, while Elastic SIEM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) writes "A mature and simple to use product, but needs a cloud deployment option". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Elastic SIEM writes "Continuously evolving on the security front and it has good speed, detail, and visualization". ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is most compared with Splunk, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm NextGen SIEM, McAfee ESM and FireEye Helix, whereas Elastic SIEM is most compared with Splunk, Fortinet FortiSIEM, AlienVault OSSIM and IBM QRadar. See our ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs. Elastic SIEM report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.