Compare Arcsight Logger vs. Check Point Security Management

Arcsight Logger is ranked 9th in Log Management with 5 reviews while Check Point Security Management is ranked 15th in Log Management with 4 reviews. Arcsight Logger is rated 8.8, while Check Point Security Management is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Arcsight Logger writes "Can handle a huge amount of logs and we are able to create use cases to fit our needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point Security Management writes "Good scalability and a straightforward setup, but the solution needs performance tuning options". Arcsight Logger is most compared with ELK Logstash, Splunk and IBM QRadar, whereas Check Point Security Management is most compared with ELK Logstash, AT&T AlienVault USM and Fortinet FortiAnalyzer. See our Arcsight Logger vs. Check Point Security Management report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Arcsight Logger? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Arcsight Logger vs. Check Point Security Management and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
382,196 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
We haven't had any crashes or bugs. It is stable.The ability to customize the solution in great detail is its most valuable features. We can customize the use cases and also have the ability to do scripting. We can personalize our dashboard as well. The scalability the solution offers is quite impressive.The most valuable feature is the level of detail that you can see about certain events, even when they do not come up in the console.In our country we are a little bit private in terms of solutions, so we are just starting to use the basic data capture. Now some users can start to use additional features that come with Micro Focus ArcSight like user behavior analytics for investigating.The ESM use cases are the most valuable. It enables us to use the big data collection inside our company. We are able to create use cases for whatever it suits and I find that the most interesting part of any SIEM solution.

Read more »

It's a great solution for management. We can manage a lot at the same time with one security management system. Also, each gateway depends on the other, which is helpful.The firewall's blades are the solution's most valuable feature.Key features include the ability to include logs for everything that you do for admin. Also, it has web filtering built in and VPN.URL filtering is a very important feature.

Read more »

Cons
In the next release, I want to see more intelligence.The solution should make it possible to integrate network analysis features.I would like to see better scheduling in the next release of this solution.I think the ArcSight team should try to simplify legacy products for the customers, because that product is not easy to use or to work with. It needs more more competency or appeal to use. We hope Micro Focus is trying to resolve this.The speed of Logger indexing and searching for certain bugs for some queries that we provide could be improved. It can handle a huge number of logs but it can be improved.

Read more »

In the last version from 80.20, there are some issues around SSNA Diction. I would like this to be improved.We sometimes have trouble with the performance of the solution. Maybe some performance tuning options could be added in a future release. There should be more visibility about which blade in your firewall is causing the latency.I would like the ability to have an overview, cross-site: One portal that does all firewalls. Also, the user interface is overly complicated.The usability of the solution could be improved.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
ArcSight Logger is very expensive compared to their competitors, but when we talk to the customer and explain what the features are and how we can scale, they understand. Still, ArcSight is more expensive than the competition.

Read more »

Do the homework because Check Point is rather expensive.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
382,196 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
9th
out of 46 in Log Management
Views
2,326
Comparisons
1,829
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
445
Avg. Rating
8.8
15th
out of 46 in Log Management
Views
793
Comparisons
598
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
313
Avg. Rating
7.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 41% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
Micro Focus Arcsight Logger, HPE Arcsight LoggerR80.10, R80, R77.30, R77, Check Point R80.10 Security Management, R80 Security Management
Learn
Micro Focus
Check Point
Overview
HPE ArcSight Data Platform (ADP) offers a future-ready data solution that enriches data in real time and supports open standards for better threat detection. Using security data connectors, ADP collects data and enriches it in real-time to give analysts organized information that can be acted upon instantly.

R80.30 Cyber Security Management features centralized management control across all networks and cloud environments, increasing operational efficiency and lowering the complexity of managing your security. Learn more about Security Management.

Offer
Learn more about Arcsight Logger
Learn more about Check Point Security Management
Sample Customers
China Merchants Bank, Bank AlJazira, Banca IntesaHedgetec, Geiger
Find out what your peers are saying about Arcsight Logger vs. Check Point Security Management and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
382,196 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email