Compare ArcSight vs. DNIF

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Devo Logo
Read 3 Devo reviews.
4,532 views|2,658 comparisons
ArcSight Logo
16,555 views|10,905 comparisons
DNIF Logo
Read 2 DNIF reviews.
2,031 views|1,365 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight vs. DNIF and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The user interface is really modern. As an end-user, there are a lot of possibilities to tailor the platform to your needs, and that can be done without needing much support from Devo. It's really flexible and modular. The UI is very clean.One of the biggest features of the UI is that you see the actual code of what you're doing in the graphical user interface, in a little window on the side. Whatever you're doing, you see the code, what's happening. And you can really quickly switch between using the GUI and using the code. That's really useful.Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of the user interface. The UI has a graphically interface with the raw data in a table. The table can be as big as you want it, depending on your use case. You can easily get a report combining your data, along with calculations and graphical dashboards. You don't need a lot of training, because the UI is relatively very intuitive.Being able to build and modify dashboards on the fly with Activeboards streamlines my analyst time because my analysts aren't doing it across spreadsheets or five different tools to try to build a timeline out themselves. They can just ingest it all, build a timeline out across all the logging, and all the different information sources in one dashboard. So, it's a huge time saver. It also has the accuracy of being able to look at all those data sources in one view. The log analysis, which would take 40 hours, we can probably get through it in about five to eight hours using Devo.

More Devo Pros »

The product is quite mature. It's been around for a long time.ArcSight gives us better visibility into threats that were unknown earlier.For the typical malware or intrusion, this solution assists us by identifying the symptoms based on network traffic from the application servers.I think that the overall experience with this solution is good, but in particular, I think that the dashboards are quite interactive.This process has helped to improve our organization because we have centralized the intra-group security equipment logs.When WannaCry attacks I can minimize the damage. My company had no protection at the time. We get alerts in ArcSight and then whenever a user got a copy of WannaCry and the WannaCry malware wants to connect to the mother ship, it alerts me in the ArcSight dashboard, and that helps us a lot. We then just go to the user and erase the malware.We do consulting and I get feedback from our clients that the product really helped them with compliance, especially with GDPR.The webpage algorithm is the most valuable feature because it was the fastest feature for searching the logs, events, and correlation.

More ArcSight Pros »

The solution is quite stable and offers good performance. It also works on a virtual machine. We haven't found any issues with it so far. It's been reliable.The response time on queries is super-fast.The User Behavior Analytics is a built-in threat-hunting feature. It detects and reports on any kind of malware or ransomware that enters the network.

More DNIF Pros »

Cons
The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel. Its functionality is mature, but the look and feel is not there. For example, if you have some data sets and are trying to get some graphics, you cannot change anything. There's just one format for the graphics. You cannot change the size of the font, the font itself, etc.There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the machine data simpler.Their documentation could be better. They are growing quickly and need to have someone focused on tech writing to ensure that all the different updates, how to use them, and all the new features and functionality are properly documented.

More Devo Cons »

The biggest requirement is that there is no cloud solution for this product yet. They need to create a cloud version. It's the biggest thing they can do to make the solution better.We would like the ability to easily identify either unused resources or those that are being used sub-optimally.The weakness in this system comes about because, with so many different logs, it is possible that the security analyst will lose information.It would be nice if the interface were more user-friendly, with, for example, a minimal number of tabs to navigate.There are several improvements that we would like to see, including: Building a system based on a log collection (SOC), a scenario for external encroachment, and Operator training.In other products, I have found that they use some kind of GUI that is drag and drop. While in ArcSight they use still scripting. They should keep scripting because some people prefer scripting but they should have the option for those who prefer using drag and drop.I would like for them to integrate mobile devices. Integration or any kind of functionality which will act as a substitute for IBM so that we can really track our mobile devices as well as look at SIEM.The security area has room for improvement.

More ArcSight Cons »

The vendor is fairly new and it's not as big as some of the international competitors. It's not a mature product. If you ask them to move data, it might take a lot of time.The solution should be able to connect to endpoints, such as desktops and laptops... If this solution had a smart connector to these logs- Windows, Linux, or any other logs - without affecting the performance of the connector, that would be wonderful.

More DNIF Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money.We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom.It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less.

More Devo Pricing and Cost Advice »

The cost of the solution is not very high, although hiring a qualified analyst to work with the product is expensive.The pricing is great compared to others.

More ArcSight Pricing and Cost Advice »

The pricing is based on the log size.

More DNIF Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
431,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 59% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 36% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
LogtrustMicro Focus ArcSight, HPE ArcSight
Learn
Devo
Micro Focus
NETMONASTERY
Overview

Devo unlocks the full value of machine data for the world’s most instrumented enterprises by putting more data to work now. With Devo, IT executives finally realize the transformational promise of machine data to drive breakthrough projects that move the entire business forward.

ArcSight is Micro Focus' leading Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solution. ArcSight helps businesses protect their data through compliance solutions and security analytics.

There are a number of different products and solutions in the ArcSight family so you are able to pick and choose those that are best suited to your business requirements.

With ArcSight, IT can:

  • Monitor IT infrastructure.
  • Manage insider security with secure identity and access control.
  • Automate compliance.
  • Monitor applications.
  • Manage security risks.
  • Identify APTs.

DNIF offers solutions to the world’s most challenging cybersecurity problems. Recognized by Gartner and used by some of the well-known global companies like PwC, Vodafone and Tata, this next generation analytics platform combines Security and Big Data Analytics to provide real-time threat detection and analytics to the most critical data assets on the Internet. With over a decade of experience in threat detection systems, DNIF has one of the fastest query response times and bridges the gap between searching, processing, analyzing and visualizing data thereby enabling companies with better SOC (Security Operations Center) management.

Offer
See Devo in Action

See how Devo allows you to free yourself from data management, and make machine data and insights accessible.

Learn more about ArcSight
Learn more about DNIF
Sample Customers
NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, Public Library of Science, OpenTextLake Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa, and Obrela. Vodafone India, IDEA Cellular, RBL Bank, NCDEX, NSE
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider12%
Media Company8%
K 12 Educational Company Or School5%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm36%
Comms Service Provider23%
Insurance Company9%
Computer Software Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm13%
Government7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider42%
Computer Software Company33%
Media Company7%
Outsourcing Company5%
Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight vs. DNIF and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
ArcSight is ranked 11th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 8 reviews while DNIF is ranked 21st in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 2 reviews. ArcSight is rated 7.6, while DNIF is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of ArcSight writes "A mature and simple to use product, but needs a cloud deployment option". On the other hand, the top reviewer of DNIF writes "Powerful analytics and machine-learning enable us to find attack patterns". ArcSight is most compared with Splunk, IBM QRadar, McAfee ESM, LogRhythm NextGen SIEM and SolarWinds LEM, whereas DNIF is most compared with Splunk, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm NextGen SIEM, ELK Logstash and Elastic SIEM. See our ArcSight vs. DNIF report. /' We've helped 431,275 professionals make an informed decision, / with our validated product reviews, independent rankings, and peer opinions. /.promo-video-link / = link_to('See how it works.', '#', id: 'gitb-video-pane-open', / data: { :'video-link' => 'https://www.youtube.com/embed/RVO4FHQxGVM', :'video-width' => '640', :'video-height' => '360' }) /br
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.