We performed a comparison between Ardoq and MEGA HOPEX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Architecture Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is very interactive."
"What I find the most valuable is the process workflow. It is really good."
"It generates friendly websites and presents specific views of the enterprise (business, functional, applicative, technological, and infrastructure)."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the reuse of common enterprise components and entities."
"The platform is stable."
"The most valuable feature of MEGA HOPEX is the publication method for static websites. You can generate the whole database into a static website. Additionally, in the new tabular entry, you don't have to put objects or links, you can go and fill a tab and the MEGA HOPEX will generate an object for you in a simple way."
"We have many use cases for this solution but the feature I have found most valuable is the IT Portfolio Management module."
"An advantage is its accessibility."
"The training environment wasn't very intuitive, but maybe with more use, it will get better."
"Scalability as a standalone system is good, given the information that has been described inside Ardoq. But not the scalability as a third-party system or with integration with other systems. Because in this direction, the scalability is about zero for Ardoq."
"An area for improvement in MEGA HOPEX is its vast learning curve. The tool is also heavy, so that's a pain point. MEGA HOPEX is also tricky to use if you don't train for many hours."
"MEGA HOPEX's problem is that it is expensive, but it's a fantastic tool."
"The solution lacks additional models compared to other tools."
"We would like to see integration with other products, such as being able to use our workflow with SharePoint and Microsoft Office."
"It would be great if this solution could integrate with other tools such as ITSM (ServiceNow) or CMDB."
"Better documentation and training would be helpful."
"The features are limited. I'm hoping in the future the solution will be bigger and include more items. Right now, overall, it needs more."
"In my experience, I've encountered difficulties with consuming custom packages in MEGA HOPEX, which leads to redundant work when deploying them to production. This is an area where improvement is needed. While version six offers better UI and UX, resolving this issue should be a priority. I believe it's important to fully explore MEGA HOPEX's capabilities before suggesting new ones."
Ardoq is ranked 12th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 2 reviews while MEGA HOPEX is ranked 5th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 36 reviews. Ardoq is rated 7.6, while MEGA HOPEX is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Ardoq writes "Provides stable performance and scalability but not intuitive for data modeling". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MEGA HOPEX writes "Easy to use and robust with good features". Ardoq is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, LeanIX, BiZZdesign HoriZZon, ADOIT and erwin Data Modeler by Quest, whereas MEGA HOPEX is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, LeanIX, ARIS BPA and Avolution ABACUS. See our Ardoq vs. MEGA HOPEX report.
See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.