We performed a comparison between ARIS BPA and KiSSFLOW based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Objects can be reused across different BPMNs and processes, so we can design new processes quicker and easier."
"It helps to maintain a single source of truth regarding the processes followed within an organization."
"The solution has come up with a web portal that makes it easy to model and show to clients."
"This solution has helped us in terms of discovering business processes."
"The ability to sort via multiple criteria to identify the relationships you need for a specific object."
"The matrix model makes building relations easier."
"It brings transparency and 360-degree views of end-to-end processes."
"It is a well-featured, functional product."
"The best thing is the no-code part. Even a person without experience with the coding language can easily understand and build the processes."
"Kissflow has reduced the bottleneck around getting approval for certain items in the company."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"The best thing about KiSSFLOW is that we can do virtual approvals."
"The user interface is very, very good."
"The support team responds fast."
"I like the forms which help us to get information."
"The flexibility and speed in modifying and creating processes are great features. If we have a process in mind, we can usually create it within ten minutes."
"Making it more customizable and easy to learn would be a benefit."
"Its governance tool and integration with ESB and execution engine can be improved. Their partner support can also be improved."
"The reporting and the information query features could do with some improvement."
"The Risk and Compliance Management tool is rather complex and moreover, it needs to be customized if you want to use it."
"Newer versions (9.x) are technically more difficult to maintain."
"There should be a more intuitive tool when creating reports."
"With ARIS BPM, the script creation is quite cumbersome. With version ten, we needed our developers to do scripting."
"The reporting capabilities and the ability to create custom reports need to be simplified and made easy so that people even with a good functional understanding of the tool can leverage it to create their own custom report."
"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."
"If Kissflow can help users to be able to organize the company manuals and information, the blogs, and everything into one resource, that would be awesome."
"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."
"In future releases, it would be interesting to have a repository or portal within KiSSFLOW where users can interact with the KiSSFLOW community."
"KiSSFLOW needs to improve its integration."
"One area where I believe Kissflow can be improved is customization."
"There is a lag in the delay between API calls."
"The integration between forms should be made easier."
ARIS BPA is ranked 6th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 64 reviews while KiSSFLOW is ranked 10th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. ARIS BPA is rated 8.4, while KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of ARIS BPA writes "I can usually find an answer to my issue on ARIS Community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". ARIS BPA is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ADONIS, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Camunda and Bizagi, whereas KiSSFLOW is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Camunda, ServiceNow, Nintex Process Platform and OutSystems. See our ARIS BPA vs. KiSSFLOW report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
