We performed a comparison between ARIS BPA and OpenText ProVision based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The technical support is good."
"ARIS Reporting – Helps download valuable content from the tool in multiple formats."
"The EPC modeling is very detailed, the semantic check is helpful, and auto-layout simplifies the formatting."
"The most valuable feature in the latest versions is the connect portal, where you can do very simple modeling using the web-based portal."
"This solution has helped us in terms of discovering business processes."
"Also, the UML parts have been improved very much in the last two years. And it's very powerful now to combine the BPMN and UML parts in the product, because you can make a connection between them, so that you have the right interoperability between them. So if you're doing data modeling, you can use your class diagram and bind that to the BPMN part."
"The most valuable features of ARIS BPA are the centralized repository and the automatic rendering of diagrams."
"Object oriented modeling allows us to trace what's going on with the specified object."
"All the features come as part of a standard license."
"OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information."
"The stability of the product is very good."
"Making it more customizable and easy to learn would be a benefit."
"One of the biggest challenges is to realistically enable the defined structures of the processes that you have in ARIS documented, and then actually implement them in the business."
"There is not enough documentation provided for the tool's support or administration."
"Displaying role allocation matrix models in ARIS Connect needs improvement."
"Migration to the next release is very tricky. You can't do it without support from ARIS or from a software kit. And it takes a lot of time and a lot of money to migrate. My impression is that a lot of companies do not migrate regularly because of that issue."
"The areas of ARIS where we see room for improvement are actually related to the background services that support it. Over the last number of years, Software AG has moved from an on-premises solution into deploying a SaaS solution to their enterprise base. That has been really successful from my point of view, as I have been a customer of ARIS, managing the relationship, for a couple years. Certain support functions around the knowledge base, customer service, and the cross and upselling of modules within the core ARIS component are lagging behind the SaaS movement."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and better designed."
"End-to-end visibility and real-time are areas that will need greater attention."
"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."
"OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use."
"Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."
ARIS BPA is ranked 6th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 64 reviews while OpenText ProVision is ranked 35th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews. ARIS BPA is rated 8.4, while OpenText ProVision is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of ARIS BPA writes "I can usually find an answer to my issue on ARIS Community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText ProVision writes "Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration". ARIS BPA is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ADONIS, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Camunda and Bizagi, whereas OpenText ProVision is most compared with Visio, SAP Signavio Process Manager and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect. See our ARIS BPA vs. OpenText ProVision report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
