We performed a comparison between ARIS BPA and BIC Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The BPMN notation and the share flow through users. It is nice to see all flows in a common, shared space for all the stakeholders to view the same thing and the same language."
"The solution's basic features are easy to use, overall designed well, and it has good process mining analysis."
"The most valuable features of ARIS BPA are the centralized repository and the automatic rendering of diagrams."
"The solution has come up with a web portal that makes it easy to model and show to clients."
"It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"It is a well-featured, functional product."
"ARIS BPA provides very good visibility and control of processes because we have a concurrent license system. As a result, every person in our company and group is able to look at the published processes."
"The stability of the ARIS BPM platform is quite good. The nice thing about it is the central database, where we can use all of our data. We can even manage users."
"This is low-cost and very user friendly. A variety of models are available depending on the needs of the customer."
"While this is a new product it has a mature feel from being built by a company with many years in the business."
"The central dictionary is a valuable feature."
"The product is easy to use."
"User interface (UI)."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and better designed."
"The user experience's usability (in general) should be improved as the tool is updated."
"I had this decentralization mission where I had some friendly fights with the consultants of Software AG. My opinion was the business department should be able to publish their processes and do all their evaluation stuff in ARCM themselves. It has to be a one stop shop. I want a one stop shop to go from ARIS BPM to ARIS ARCM, because having everything go through that would be an improvement due to the inputs that we made with Software AG. They will make it possible that the trigger sent from BPM to ARCM will start their object generation."
"One of the biggest challenges is to realistically enable the defined structures of the processes that you have in ARIS documented, and then actually implement them in the business."
"The governance mechanism could be better, as could automation."
"With ARIS BPM, the script creation is quite cumbersome. With version ten, we needed our developers to do scripting."
"It would be helpful if ARIS BPA could have a simple database to get the extract of various attributes."
"The solution could improve its connectivity to other systems."
"There's an issue with the current manual that they're working on."
"As the product is very new, some minor features are still missing, but everything is there to handle day-to-day process modeling."
"The product needs improvement regarding the confidentiality of the domain information for the key administrator."
ARIS BPA is ranked 4th in Business Process Design with 64 reviews while BIC Platform is ranked 18th in Business Process Design with 4 reviews. ARIS BPA is rated 8.4, while BIC Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ARIS BPA writes "I can usually find an answer to my issue on ARIS Community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of BIC Platform writes "Provides good stability, but they should add a feature for enterprise architecture". ARIS BPA is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ADONIS, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Camunda and Appian, whereas BIC Platform is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, Visio, Camunda, ADONIS and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect. See our ARIS BPA vs. BIC Platform report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors and best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
