We performed a comparison between Board and Software AG ARIS Process Mining based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Performance Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."All staff can now see their relevant scorecards online."
"We have better reporting and have been able to better track performance."
"The aesthetics of it are really nice. That is what attracted us to BOARD: the ease and functionality of it."
"The reporting part has been very valuable as the capabilities of the tool do not have to change graphs, change how grids are displayed, and can create reports on the fly."
"Primary valuable features are its flexibility and versatility and, obviously, functionality goes along with that. Plus, it does that at a small footprint in the file servers, and does it very efficiently."
"The ability to do write back and visualization, with minimal IT development orientation."
"We can build reports super fast."
"The flexibility and the user-experience are the most valuable features of the solution."
"It is a stable solution...I rate the technical support a ten out of ten...On a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy, I rate the setup a nine."
"It is very easy to work on the way the ETL happens in ARIS Process Mining."
"One feature I found really cool was the Conformance Engine."
"The interface is simplified and easy to use."
"I have found Software AG ARIS Process Mining scalable."
"I would like to see better relationships with the partners."
"We would like to see better logging in the procedural world."
"We have had some challenges with newer version of the rollout in terms of stability."
"If we could upload other data, e.g., pivot tables which can be done in BOARD already, that we have pre-existing and have that data distribute to more complex spreadsheets, I would like that going forward."
"We can't delete entities and cubes in Boards because it interrupts our whole data model."
"The initial setup was very complex for us."
"It would be huge in the future if BOARD offered a lot more graphs and presentations, and it was a lot easier to use."
"One of the things that I would like to see is the ability to have a rule directly referenced on the cubes."
"When the process models are transferred back to the design environment for further optimization and simulations, we need to see some improvements in the way the models get created in the design."
"There should be a single site for modeling and mining."
"I guess we have many unnecessary steps within our processes. There is room for automation and room for enhancement within our application portfolio management...In short, I would like to eliminate unnecessary steps in some processes in this solution."
"The installation is straightforward, we didn't have any technical issues with installing. However, we needed support to complete the implementation."
"Customizing KPIs and building dashboards were not as intuitive as other similar tools."
More Software AG ARIS Process Mining Pricing and Cost Advice →
Board is ranked 11th in Business Performance Management with 35 reviews while Software AG ARIS Process Mining is ranked 14th in Business Performance Management with 6 reviews. Board is rated 8.6, while Software AG ARIS Process Mining is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Board writes "A stable solution with good user-experience, easy deployment but needs some improvement with engine ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Software AG ARIS Process Mining writes "An easy-to-use interface with quite good learning center and documentation". Board is most compared with Anaplan, SAP Analytics Cloud, IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Hyperion and Microsoft Power BI, whereas Software AG ARIS Process Mining is most compared with Celonis, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining, Anaplan and Oracle Hyperion. See our Board vs. Software AG ARIS Process Mining report.
See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.
We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.