ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager vs Methodware Kairos comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager and Methodware Kairos based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC.
To learn more, read our detailed GRC Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is the risk testing, where you can attach your processes to the risk, and automatically generate all of the tests."

More ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager Pros →

"The most valuable feature is the ability to import and export using industry standards like XMI and XML metadata interchange managing the data in and data out."

More Methodware Kairos Pros →

Cons
"I would like to see the modeling less strict so that connectors can be more flexible."

More ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager Cons →

"We are currently working on making Essence one hundred percent compliant and we are not there yet."

More Methodware Kairos Cons →

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The most valuable feature is the ability to import and export using industry standards like XMI and XML metadata interchange managing the data in and data out.
Top Answer:We are currently working on making this software 100% compliant with the main method standard in the industry, i.e. “Essence”.
Top Answer:We use the Kairos GRC solution to integrate GRC methods in various consultancy offerings.
Ranking
27th
out of 84 in GRC
Views
292
Comparisons
183
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
16th
out of 84 in GRC
Views
71
Comparisons
43
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
330
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Kairos
Learn More
Methodware
Video Not Available
Overview

Distance yourself from the potentially devastating risks of noncompliance. Using ARIS for risk and compliance management means you have a process-focused approach to an enterprise-wide compliance and risk management system.

ARIS can be used to implement and efficiently operate an enterprise-wide compliance and risk management system. You can protect your business from potentially devastating risks of non-compliance while reducing your costs, using a single source of truth to ensure effective enterprise operations and compliance. 

Kairos is a fully integrated and comprehensive governance, risk and compliance solution
Sample Customers
Alicorp, Tesco, Dubai Municipality, Emirates NBD, Suva - ARIS serves customers across all industries and of every size worldwide. Companies trust ARIS as being in the market of business process management for more than 30 years, serving users worldwide, from 1 user companies to the Fortune 500.
Global Insurance Syndicate
Buyer's Guide
GRC
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager is ranked 27th in GRC while Methodware Kairos is ranked 16th in GRC with 2 reviews. ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager is rated 8.0, while Methodware Kairos is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager writes "Risk testing feature enables you to attach your processes to the risk, and automatically generate all of the tests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Methodware Kairos writes "Meeting industry standards now and for the future, straightforward setup, with reliability ". ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager is most compared with RSA Archer, whereas Methodware Kairos is most compared with .

See our list of best GRC vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.