Compare ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager vs. SAS Enterprise GRC

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
4th
out of 54 in GRC
Views
388
Comparisons
215
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
313
Rating
8.0
15th
out of 54 in GRC
Views
378
Comparisons
312
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview
ARIS Risk & Compliance Manager takes a process-focused approach to efficient Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC).It can be used to implement and efficiently operate an enterprise-wide compliance and risk management system. You can protect your business from potentially devastating risks of non-compliance while reducing your costs.
With SAS Enterprise GRC, you can standardize and manage strategic and operational risks, and consolidate information from all financial risk management systems (credit risk, market risk, etc.) into an enterprisewide view of risk.
Offer
Learn more about ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager
Learn more about SAS Enterprise GRC
Sample Customers
SOKA-BAU, MAPFRE, ATB Financial, Openreach, Kiabi, Georgia Technology Authority, KV Hessen, SKF GmbH, Public Authority of Civil Information (PACI), Accarda, CWS-boco, Essent, CosmosDirekt
Belgium Special Tax, New Zealand Ministry of Health, New Zealand Ministry of Social Development North Carolina Marine Fisheries, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Town of Cary Western Australia Police

ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager is ranked 4th in GRC while SAS Enterprise GRC is ranked 15th in GRC. ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager is rated 0.0, while SAS Enterprise GRC is rated 0.0. On the other hand, ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager is most compared with RSA Archer, MetricStream and SAP BusinessObjects GRC, whereas SAS Enterprise GRC is most compared with ACL Analytics, RSA Archer and Thomson Reuters Accelus.

See our list of best GRC vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.