Seth HinkSenior Network Engineer II at Mercury General Corporation
Anonymous UserInformation Technology & Audio Visual Engineer at a non-tech company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The most valuable feature is the Linux shell, which is useful for troubleshooting or capturing traffic."
"What we like most is its performance to price ratio."
"It's an extremely reliable platform for the network switches we use."
"The solution has good load latency. They're the market leader in this aspect right now."
"The solution is very stable."
"It is very stable. It has good hardware and very stable code. It provides good value for its price. They are a very lean type of organization, so they are very responsive, and they're able to focus more on their platform versus having multiple products out there."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is managed switching."
"They don't ever fail and they have a long service life."
"The biggest advantage of having this solution is that it is easy to find engineers, and they are cheaper than hiring HP engineers."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of configuring a switch."
"In terms of technology, Cisco is the leader in everything. I'd rather buy a second-hand Cisco switch than a brand new switch from a competitor. They're that reliable and resilient."
"We have dealt with Cisco's technical support in the past. They were especially helpful and very polite. They are always there if we need them and their insights are always excellent. I would say that we have been satisfied with the level of support we've gotten so far."
"They have a robust monitoring system."
"A very expandable solution."
"The CVP management platform needs to be improved."
"The intent-based networking management, together with the provider of these solutions that are already free, would be beneficial."
"The solution needs to accommodate new features."
"The solution needs to improve their product range."
"Its price can be better."
"Cisco should provide customers with a more advantageous licensing model included with the purchase of the equipment."
"The price is high and it should be improved."
"I would like to see better compatibility between Cisco and other vendors."
"Reducing the price would be an improvement."
"Out of the competition, Cisco switches are easily the most expensive."
"The user interface needs improvement. Meraki has a much nicer UI. Cisco could learn a lot by looking at them. It might make them a bit more user friendly."
"The biggest issue we are having is with bugs and memory loss, which occurs when developing the IOS."
"The switches could be improved."
"Arista is very expensive. Not everybody is in a position to spend $70,000 to $80,000 for one switch."
"It is pretty pricey for a networking platform. It is on par with Cisco."
"Try to buy everything you need in bulk purchases and ask Cisco for volume discounts."
"The price of Cisco equipment is very expensive and you have to pay extra for support."
"The cost of a license before COVID and before the lockdown was approximately three lakh 70,000 in Indian Rupees. After this COVID situation, the cost has gone down to two lakh 46,000 rupees."
"Licensing is on a yearly basis. We usually spend up to $20,000."
"The solution is probably the most expensive, but users who want the best need to pay the premium."
"Cisco products are not that cheap."
"Cisco switches are expensive. Their price range is based not only on what the product does but also the name in the industry. They are good at what they do. If you need a better product, there are other lineups available."
"I don't see any price issue with Cisco. Whenever you buy a quality product, you always have a mindset of paying the premium amount. For any good product, you pay a premium amount, but that also means you are going to recover that premium over a period of time in terms of performance."
Arista Networks Platform is ranked 3rd in Data Center Networking with 6 reviews while Cisco Catalyst Switches is ranked 1st in Data Center Networking with 56 reviews. Arista Networks Platform is rated 8.4, while Cisco Catalyst Switches is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Arista Networks Platform writes "Linux shell helpful for troubleshooting and capturing traffic, but the documentation needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Catalyst Switches writes "This gives us control of our throughput traffic but it comes with mandatory options that increase cost". Arista Networks Platform is most compared with Cisco Nexus, Juniper Ethernet Switches, Mellanox Switches, Aruba Switches and Cisco Ethernet Switches, whereas Cisco Catalyst Switches is most compared with HPE ProCurve, Cisco Nexus, Dell PowerConnect Switches, QSC Q-SYS NS Series and Dell-Force10 Campus LAN Switches. See our Arista Networks Platform vs. Cisco Catalyst Switches report.
See our list of best Data Center Networking vendors.
We monitor all Data Center Networking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.