Anonymous UserNetwork Engineer at a comms service provider
Anonymous UserHead of Technical at a tech services company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The most valuable feature is the Linux shell, which is useful for troubleshooting or capturing traffic."
"What we like most is its performance to price ratio."
"It's an extremely reliable platform for the network switches we use."
"The solution has good load latency. They're the market leader in this aspect right now."
"The solution is very stable."
"It is very stable. It has good hardware and very stable code. It provides good value for its price. They are a very lean type of organization, so they are very responsive, and they're able to focus more on their platform versus having multiple products out there."
"It provides telemetry and visibility for many metrics that are not supported by most of the other vendors. Out of the box, no third party solutions are needed."
"For me, the initial setup was easy and straightforward, but for some of our customers who are not as familiar with networking, it can be complicated."
"A stable product that is absolutely dependable."
"This is a great solution for network switching and security."
"The technical support is good and they respond quickly. I haven't had any problems."
"The most valuable feature is the complete functionality, but the most important thing is support."
"The queue functionality is the solution's most valuable feature, specifically because we are delivering a lot of Layer 2 services. Layer 2 protocol tunnels work well on Cisco switches."
"One valuable feature is that you can string a number of switches together, and the fact that there are various methods to connect them, such as by stacking."
"The command-line interface is easy to use."
"The CVP management platform needs to be improved."
"The intent-based networking management, together with the provider of these solutions that are already free, would be beneficial."
"The solution needs to accommodate new features."
"The solution needs to improve their product range."
"Its price can be better."
"The community is good but is not good enough. It still needs to grow more."
"The dashboard needs some minor improvements."
"The product could improve in the area of simulated switches."
"Technical support for integrations with other network products is insufficient and should be improved."
"This may be something that they are already working on, but it would be an improvement if they could add a layer of security to layer two and layer three to protect the server and to protect the data."
"Pricing could be lower."
"The solution needs to work on lowering the amount of bugs. We find them quite regularly."
"Switches should be made stackable, even if they are not of the same model."
"The licensing needs to be improved."
"Arista is very expensive. Not everybody is in a position to spend $70,000 to $80,000 for one switch."
"It is pretty pricey for a networking platform. It is on par with Cisco."
"Cost wise, Arista Networks Platform is more expensive than other networking solutions."
"Not inexpensive. Price will vary widely depending on the chosen product and size of the deployment."
"Pricing for this product is high but the cost is worth it if you can afford it."
"The pricing is reasonable, and for small business it is acceptable."
"The price of this solution is good."
"This is an expensive solution, but you are paying for stability."
"The last time I bought a 24-port switch, which was a while ago, I paid about five or six thousand Euros. In this part of the world, that's quite expensive for us."
"These switches are expensive, but they are an excellent buy and definitely have value for the investment."
"We are happy with the pricing from Cisco."
Arista Networks Platform is ranked 12th in Ethernet Switches with 7 reviews while Cisco Ethernet Switches is ranked 1st in Ethernet Switches with 61 reviews. Arista Networks Platform is rated 8.6, while Cisco Ethernet Switches is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Arista Networks Platform writes "Linux shell helpful for troubleshooting and capturing traffic, but the documentation needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Ethernet Switches writes "A versatile solution with stacking capability". Arista Networks Platform is most compared with Cisco Catalyst Switches, Cisco Nexus, Juniper Ethernet Switches, Aruba Switches and Meraki MS Switches, whereas Cisco Ethernet Switches is most compared with NETGEAR Switches, Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access, Juniper Ethernet Switches, Brocade Ethernet Switches and Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches. See our Arista Networks Platform vs. Cisco Ethernet Switches report.
See our list of best Ethernet Switches vendors.
We monitor all Ethernet Switches reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.