We performed a comparison between Arista Networks Platform and Enterasys Data Center Networking Equipment [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Arista, Dell Technologies and others in Data Center Networking."The solution has good load latency. They're the market leader in this aspect right now."
"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."
"What we like most is its performance to price ratio."
"It is very stable. It has good hardware and very stable code. It provides good value for its price. They are a very lean type of organization, so they are very responsive, and they're able to focus more on their platform versus having multiple products out there."
"The solution is very stable."
"The best part is the single operating system that they have. Regardless of your model, it's the same operating system functioning across the board, which means you don't have to worry about backward compatibilities between your older switches and the new ones that you deploy."
"The solution is scalable."
"The most valuable feature is the Linux shell, which is useful for troubleshooting or capturing traffic."
"Enterasys Data Center Networking Equipment's most valuable feature is that the data is easy to set up and control. We can manage everything from the cloud and it has been good for our clients."
More Enterasys Data Center Networking Equipment [EOL] Pros →
"The solution is quite expensive. One of the negative aspects of it is the pricing."
"The community is good but is not good enough. It still needs to grow more."
"The solution needs to accommodate new features."
"The solution needs to improve their product range."
"An area for improvement in Arista Networks Platform is its integration, e.g. it needs to have more integration with its new products. Incorporating more security and cloud is also another area for improvement in the platform."
"They need to enhance their code and their EOS. They need to improve some security features, and there are quite a number of bugs in their system. So, they need to work on that piece. In the next release, we need to have a modular feature. Instead of providing an integrated solution, they should go for something modular. They need to come up with modular highly scalable models. Even at the chassis layer, I want to see some improvement."
"They should have a more stable code."
"I want the solution to include a unified controller."
"The security in Enterasys Data Center Networking Equipment could improve in the future."
More Enterasys Data Center Networking Equipment [EOL] Cons →
More Enterasys Data Center Networking Equipment [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Arista Networks Platform is ranked 2nd in Data Center Networking with 21 reviews while Enterasys Data Center Networking Equipment [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Data Center Networking. Arista Networks Platform is rated 8.6, while Enterasys Data Center Networking Equipment [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Arista Networks Platform writes "Affordable for enterprise-sized companies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Enterasys Data Center Networking Equipment [EOL] writes "Simple data manipulation, straightforward initial setup, and low maintenance". Arista Networks Platform is most compared with Cisco Catalyst Switches, Cisco Nexus, Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches, Aruba Switches and Cisco Ethernet Switches, whereas Enterasys Data Center Networking Equipment [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Data Center Networking vendors.
We monitor all Data Center Networking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.