We performed a comparison between Armis and Forescout Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Forescout, Nozomi, Armis Security and others in IoT Security."Armis is a straightforward and user-friendly solution."
"The most valuable feature of Forescout Platform is that it has everything that Aruba has at significantly less cost."
"Obtaining visibility into the network and connected devices is very simple with this tool. It takes me three minutes to do a base deployment when all the parameters are available."
"Provides a good overview of all devices on a network."
"Forescout CounterACT has allowed us to better open our access and control wireless access globally from our HQ. This allows us to monitor the network access for every office globally. This has improved overall security, reducing risk and opening up the opportunity to provide greater end user flexibility."
"The initial setup is easy, taking no more than two or three weeks."
"Its feature that I have found most valuable is that it is very granular. You can configure granular controls just as you want those policies to be implemented. It gives you that flexibility to go granular in how you want your controls to be implemented. That's something I like about it."
"It's one of the tools that has given the federal government visibility into network devices and everything."
"Forescout Platform has granular features and one of the most impressive features is the agentless feature."
"Armis doesn't have a back intel feature."
"Forescout needs to upgrade its development in the future."
"Regarding pricing, there is room for improvement to enhance competitiveness with other vendors and solutions."
"I should be able to integrate my Forescout with any other third party security technology, to build that connected security strategy."
"They need to handle their Tier 1 cases differently. The biggest negative regarding Forescout is their support. Not having the ability to get instantly transferred to a support engineer for Tier 1 cases is pretty ridiculous."
"As a user, if I am using a laptop that is Wi-Fi connected, Forescout identifies my port connectivity as one user license, and if I take that same laptop with the same username to a wired network, which is also the same network that is used for the Wi-Fi connection, Forescout detects it as a separate license."
"The ability to block external devices in Mac is lacking and needs to be added."
"The reporting feature needs improvement."
"Forescout Platform could improve the costs of integrations."
Armis is ranked 3rd in IoT Security with 1 review while Forescout Platform is ranked 1st in IoT Security with 69 reviews. Armis is rated 8.0, while Forescout Platform is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Armis writes "A straightforward and user-friendly solution that can be used for asset intelligence". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Forescout Platform writes "We can go granular on each endpoint, quarantine non-compliant machines, and target vulnerabilities through scripting". Armis is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Axonius, Claroty Platform, Tenable Vulnerability Management and Phosphorus Cybersecurity, whereas Forescout Platform is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Nozomi Networks and Tenable Security Center.
See our list of best IoT Security vendors.
We monitor all IoT Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
