• Home
  • Arrayent vs. Vortex

Arrayent vs Vortex comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Prodea Systems Logo

Arrayent

79 views|25 comparisons
PrismTech Logo

Vortex

177 views|125 comparisons
Ranking
24th
out of 33 in IoT Platforms
Views
79
Comparisons
25
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
12th
out of 33 in IoT Platforms
Views
177
Comparisons
125
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Prodea Systems
PrismTech
Overview

Arrayent is the IoT platform that enables the world's most trusted brands to deliver connected products to customers.

The Arrayent Connect Platform provides an end-to-end solution to develop, deliver, and support connected devices that can be remotely managed from anywhere in the world. The Arrayent Connect IoT Platform is deployment proven. Arrayent already enables its global brand customers, to ship 65+ consumer products across five continents.

Vortex Edge is a fully integrated IIoT Platform that turns data into real-time insights and actions at the edge. Vortex Edge enables real-time data processing and advanced analytics at the edge of an Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) system. It is a fundamental component of an integrated and complementary edge-to-cloud deployment model that can be used to address IIoT use cases where a cloud only model is insufficient
Sample Customers
Chamberlain, Liftmaster, Maytag, Monster Products, Osram / Sylvania, Pentair, SALUS Controls, Whirlpool
ProRail

Arrayent is ranked 24th in IoT Platforms while Vortex is ranked 12th in IoT Platforms. Arrayent is rated 0.0, while Vortex is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Arrayent is most compared with , whereas Vortex is most compared with AWS IoT Greengrass.

See our list of best IoT Platforms vendors.

We monitor all IoT Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.