We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The stability of the solution is very good."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides a redundant wireless connection for a client."
"The features I have found most valuable is that the solution creates a guest portal for guest networks, and setting up SSID authentication to the regular server."
"You can handle all of the access points at once virtually instead of manually handling each one. You're able to populate all of the information to all of the access points through the virtual controller as well. It transforms everything it a single access point, which simplifies things."
"In terms of stability, Aruba Instant is the best on the market."
"The central management of multiple devices is the solution's most valuable aspect."
"The integration with ClearPass is the most valuable feature."
"The access it grants to wifi is the solution's most valuable feature."
"The solution is very stable. It is a very manageable and secure system."
"Multiple access ID capabilities, meshing, and the quality of the product itself are all valuable features."
"The flexibility, since it's a cloud service, is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"The functionalities are quite professional and complete. It offers good integration with other Meraki products, like switches and the firewall. You can get an overview of all networks and the host. It's really great; nobody else can do that."
"The most valuable features are the management tools, including monitoring and reporting."
"We can deploy it and check in on our customers without having an on-site connection or an on-site infrastructure for elderly customers."
"The solution is easily scalable. There are not really any limits for the customer in terms of expanding if they need to."
"The most valuable feature is the stability. It works and doesn't stop."
"Technical support needs improvement. We use the forum for technical support assistance, but it's not enough. If you're talking with a technician, they're in India. They cannot give you the service that you need. Sometimes have problems with some personal services and technical support is not helpful in this area."
"This solution would be improved if they supplied free software controllers."
"The captive portal through Facebook doesn't work."
"The solution should be able to support more users on the access points."
"There is a problem in the preferred portal access points when I'm using the portal."
"There was only ever one case in which an access point failed, but it was reintegrated. The issue was more of a matter of oversight. One part of the network had covered ten access points."
"The meshing could use improvement but aside from that nothing else really needs improvement."
"The reach of the solution could be improved. It could be a bit stronger."
"In a future release, they should offer a next-generation UTM, where you can manage all items and the network, and have it include a lot of security features like fingerprinting functionality."
"Unfortunately, we have to deal with European privacy laws and as far as we can see, the solution is not compliant with these. It's why we're not able to continue with Cisco Meraki. They need to become compliant with GDPR laws."
"There is only one particular thing that needs improvement. Sometimes, for example, when you need to open a ticket, although it's under the umbrella of Cisco, you still need to go to the Meraki support."
"The commercial version of the solution could be cheaper."
"In the future, I would like to see IP telephony in Saudi Arabia."
"The technical support for Meraki needs improvements made to the waiting times."
"Meraki should share their viability roadmap. It is really hard to know which functionality will appear or when they will be available. It is also hard to know which features are available now but are not visible on the dashboard."
"I'd like better integration with security providers."
"I purchased the hardware and there are no monthly or yearly licenses to buy."
"We only pay for the support and the contract licenses from Aruba Instant."
"The licensing cost is somewhere around $20,000."
"The price is good, but it could be improved."
"You have to renew your contract every year, or for three or for five years. If you do not pay right away they will suspend your subscription."
"The pricing is based on a subscription and is a bit high at the moment."
"This solution is quite costly and there are costs in addition to the licensing fees."
"This solution is slightly more expensive than others, such as Ruckus Wi-Fi."
"It's not super expensive and it's not super cheap."
"The cost is not so much for Wireless LAN, but when you have to get the security license, it costs a lot."
"The price of the product could be cheaper."
Earn 20 points
Aruba Instant delivers the only controllerless Wi-Fi solution that is easy to set-up, and loaded with security and smarts needed to accelerate your business without breaking your budget.
Aruba Instant is ranked 7th in Wireless LAN with 10 reviews while Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ranked 3rd in Wireless LAN with 55 reviews. Aruba Instant is rated 8.8, while Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Aruba Instant writes "Offers a lot of flexibility, almost everything can be configured". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN writes "Knowledgeable and helpful support, and it scales and load-balances to fit our needs". Aruba Instant is most compared with Ubiquiti WLAN, Ruckus Wireless, Aruba Wireless, TP-Link Auranet EAP and Huawei Wireless, whereas Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ubiquiti Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Ruckus Wireless and Fortinet FortiWLM. See our Aruba Instant vs. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.