Most Helpful Review
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Has many advanced features: Built-in firewall, local radius, application visibility and control, not locked into support agreements.
Cisco Wireless is mostly stable with a low downrate and the signal rate is good. It is also easy to use.
The most valuable feature for us is management of the systems. We can easily access all features.
It helps with the visibility on our network.
There are a lot of valuable features and functions. One example is CleanAir to detect and troubleshoot interference issues. Another is RX-SOP to optimize roaming.
The Guest feature is pretty good.
Cisco Wireless technology allows us to logically segregate networks, to segregate the traffic between multiple types of endpoint devices, connected to the network. For example, corporate laptops are connected to one network, corporate iPhones will go through a different network.
With Cisco Wireless we have DNA technology for the frequency in which it operates, so that in case of any frequency interference it can look for and switch to another frequency, where there no interference.
The main features are that it's secure and it's easy to distribute the SSID and control it. I also like the controller.
Although built-in troubleshooting tools are available, they are not at all intuitive to use. Aruba Instant lacks decent documentation to use for troubleshooting wireless issues (fortunately there aren’t many).
The Central cloud management (optional) is far behind the competition in features, ease of use, and dependability. I have tried Aruba Central a few times over the years and, in my option, it is not where it needs to be for serious consideration in production environments.
One of our customers complained about the ripple, that some of the data was incorrect. We opened a ticket and brought it to their attention that maybe some of the data was not correct. As of now, it has been two months since we opened the ticket and the issue still hasn't been resolved.
Probably more in terms of how much power it's using. Right now it just seems like it doesn't have enough power. Maybe that is all indicated, but says exactly how much power it's using.
The web interface for Cisco controllers could be better. It could be more user-friendly. Sometimes I have to remember how to access some functionalities or how to enable or execute some functions. If it were more user-friendly it would save time.
Sometimes I've seen some issues come up with the interference. That's an issue users face at times. It becomes very complex when you have a lot of wireless interference in the area, or in your office. It's because of the environment of Cisco. Maybe, in the future, they can work on this area, and fix this issue.
There is a problem with the controller. When we have to restart the controller, it does not show the time. We have to manually configure the time when we restart it. I have read about this issue, to get some information, and all answers are about having to connect it with a time server, which is very difficult.
The GUI could be made more user-friendly. There should also be a dashboard where it can showcase how many end-users are connected to a particular access point.
There is room for improvement regarding HA issues and Radius integration.
The software quality could be improved, in particular for the new Cisco Aironet Series 2800/3800 Access Point which is pretty Linux-based.
Pricing and Cost Advice
Avoid the Central cloud license if you can.
Cisco WiFi 1572 is very expensive locally and our budget for this year is used.
This product's pricing is good. It's not too expensive.
I feel the product's pricing is a good value.
The pricing is okay. I believe it is competitively priced. But it is not just the price by itself, it's the price and the technical features. The features also play a big role. It has to give me the relevant output.
They have simplified the licensing, now there is a single license that is required. Earlier, multiple licenses were required. Single licensing is good. As a customer, I don't need to keep an inventory of multiple licenses.
Pricing is a bit on the high side compared to its competitors but we have to consider the support and usages of the solution. Licensing is now RTU and smart licensing. We need three types of licenses. One for each of the: APs, HA, controller.
Never pay the full GPL price.
The pricing is high. It could be cheaper.
out of 20 in Wireless LAN
out of 20 in Wireless LAN
Compared 100% of the time.
Compared 61% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
|Cisco WLAN Controller|
Aruba Instant delivers the only controllerless Wi-Fi solution that is easy to set-up, and loaded with security and smarts needed to accelerate your business without breaking your budget.
|With Cisco Wireless you will successfully plan, deploy, monitor, troubleshoot, and report on indoor and outdoor wireless networks - all from a centralized location.|
Learn more about Aruba Instant
Learn more about Cisco Wireless
|Purdue University, Orlando Magic, Brussels Airport Company, Molecaten Holiday Parks||Aegean Motorway, Baylor Scott & White Health, Beachbody, Bellevue, Brunel University London, Bucks County Intermediate Unit , Chartwell School, Children's Hospital Colorado, Cisco Live Milan, City of Biel, City of Mississauga, Dundee Precious Metals, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Erickson Living, Goldcorp, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS)|
No Data Available
Comms Service Provider18%
K 12 Educational Company Or School18%
Mining And Metals Company12%
Software R&D Company6%
Comms Service Provider25%
K 12 Educational Company Or School12%
Financial Services Firm11%