Compare Aruba Instant vs. Cisco Wireless

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aruba Instant Logo
2,251 views|1,653 comparisons
Cisco Wireless Logo
30,786 views|27,724 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Instant vs. Cisco Wireless and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
442,845 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The stability of the solution is very good.""The most valuable feature is that it provides a redundant wireless connection for a client.""The features I have found most valuable is that the solution creates a guest portal for guest networks, and setting up SSID authentication to the regular server.""You can handle all of the access points at once virtually instead of manually handling each one. You're able to populate all of the information to all of the access points through the virtual controller as well. It transforms everything it a single access point, which simplifies things.""In terms of stability, Aruba Instant is the best on the market.""The central management of multiple devices is the solution's most valuable aspect.""The integration with ClearPass is the most valuable feature.""The access it grants to wifi is the solution's most valuable feature."

More Aruba Instant Pros »

"The most valuable feature for us is management of the systems. We can easily access all features.""Cisco Wireless is mostly stable with a low downrate and the signal rate is good. It is also easy to use.""The initial setup was quite easy. We have a very good relationship with our integrator and our integrator has a good relationship with Cisco. The integrator that installs Cisco is quite knowledgeable about the technology. They are trained and have a good relationship with their tech. We cannot be experts in each domain and we have to be supported by an integrator.""You need to learn the technology but after that the setup is easy.""It helps with the visibility on our network.""Security is an important feature for my customers, and I am able to offer this to them with our Cisco products.""This increased mobility has helped our organization. We can talk to one another from different locations and stay in constant contact and with employees across the enterprise. Everyone has access to up-to-the-minute communications and all documents and applications on our network.""Wireless access has enabled users to be mobile and as a result, more productive."

More Cisco Wireless Pros »

Cons
"Technical support needs improvement. We use the forum for technical support assistance, but it's not enough. If you're talking with a technician, they're in India. They cannot give you the service that you need. Sometimes have problems with some personal services and technical support is not helpful in this area.""This solution would be improved if they supplied free software controllers.""The captive portal through Facebook doesn't work.""The solution should be able to support more users on the access points.""There is a problem in the preferred portal access points when I'm using the portal.""There was only ever one case in which an access point failed, but it was reintegrated. The issue was more of a matter of oversight. One part of the network had covered ten access points.""The meshing could use improvement but aside from that nothing else really needs improvement.""The reach of the solution could be improved. It could be a bit stronger."

More Aruba Instant Cons »

"Probably more in terms of how much power it's using. Right now it just seems like it doesn't have enough power. Maybe that is all indicated, but says exactly how much power it's using.""One of our customers complained about the ripple, that some of the data was incorrect. We opened a ticket and brought it to their attention that maybe some of the data was not correct. As of now, it has been two months since we opened the ticket and the issue still hasn't been resolved.""No product can be a ten out of ten and there are some security issues.""When you integrate a network access control with authentication with an ISE engine it's really complicated to put in place.""The configuration interface could be easier. They should make roaming easier and should fix it so that when you cross a building you can keep the signal.""The classic Cisco wireless interface is difficult for users to learn.""Improvements can be made to the telemetry. The licensing gets in the way here. It makes it impossible to record the different flows across the wireless network.""The new licensing has no added value and seems to be Cisco's effort to take advantage of customers."

More Cisco Wireless Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"I purchased the hardware and there are no monthly or yearly licenses to buy.""We only pay for the support and the contract licenses from Aruba Instant.""The licensing cost is somewhere around $20,000."

More Aruba Instant Pricing and Cost Advice »

"It's a bit expensive but it's professional and works properly.""Cisco WiFi 1572 is very expensive locally and our budget for this year is used.""I think that the solution is expensive because the customer has to pay for a full year, at a minimum, in up-front costs.""The cost model is expensive.""Cisco licensing is usually provided on a yearly basis rather than monthly. You can get a hardware SLA or hardware and software SLA for a period of years. Longer terms influence the level of support that you get when it comes to Cisco SLA."

More Cisco Wireless Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.
442,845 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The quick setup and automatic code embedded in one access point is really useful.
Top Answer: The licensing cost is somewhere around $20,000.
Top Answer: The product could be improved by having the ability to support more access points in one cluster. I would also suggest that the multicast be more efficient. Improved managing of the multicast could be… more »
Top Answer: The Antenna system named BEAMFLEX + is the great difference between all other brands. This Patented Technology gives Ruckus the best performance in all scenarios. No doubt Ruckus is superior.
Top Answer: Hi Gilberto, All answers are correct. Adding a new point, currently through the Cisco SDN platform (DNA Center), it is possible to have visibility of the Cisco platforms (Aironet / Catalyst) and… more »
Top Answer: Hi Imad, Thanks for your input. Do you have any POC data for Cisco and Aruba? Thanks in advance
Ranking
6th
out of 24 in Wireless LAN
Views
2,251
Comparisons
1,653
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
437
Avg. Rating
8.9
2nd
out of 24 in Wireless LAN
Views
30,786
Comparisons
27,724
Reviews
18
Average Words per Review
373
Avg. Rating
7.9
Popular Comparisons
Compared 43% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 44% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
Cisco WLAN Controller
Learn
Aruba Networks
Cisco
Overview

Aruba Instant delivers the only controllerless Wi-Fi solution that is easy to set-up, and loaded with security and smarts needed to accelerate your business without breaking your budget.

With Cisco Wireless you will successfully plan, deploy, monitor, troubleshoot, and report on indoor and outdoor wireless networks - all from a centralized location.
Offer
Learn more about Aruba Instant
Learn more about Cisco Wireless
Sample Customers
Purdue University, Orlando Magic, Brussels Airport Company, Molecaten Holiday ParksAegean Motorway, Baylor Scott & White Health, Beachbody, Bellevue, Brunel University London, Bucks County Intermediate Unit , Chartwell School, Children's Hospital Colorado, Cisco Live Milan, City of Biel, City of Mississauga, Dundee Precious Metals, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Erickson Living, Goldcorp, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS)
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider34%
Computer Software Company18%
University13%
Media Company6%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider18%
Computer Software Company8%
K 12 Educational Company Or School8%
Government8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider30%
Computer Software Company22%
Government6%
K 12 Educational Company Or School6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise36%
REVIEWERS
Small Business37%
Midsize Enterprise28%
Large Enterprise35%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise61%
Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Instant vs. Cisco Wireless and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
442,845 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Aruba Instant is ranked 6th in Wireless LAN with 10 reviews while Cisco Wireless is ranked 2nd in Wireless LAN with 20 reviews. Aruba Instant is rated 8.8, while Cisco Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aruba Instant writes "Offers a lot of flexibility, almost everything can be configured". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Wireless writes "Has good durability, we can rely on this solution and it is easy to configure". Aruba Instant is most compared with Ubiquiti WLAN, TP-Link Auranet EAP, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Ruckus Wireless, whereas Cisco Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Fortinet FortiWLM and Ubiquiti WLAN. See our Aruba Instant vs. Cisco Wireless report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.