We performed a comparison between Aruba IntroSpect and IronNet Collective Defense Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Auvik and others in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)."I haven't heard of any issues with stability."
"The most valuable feature is the end-user monitoring. If there is any abnormal behavior on the machine, the administrator will be alerted."
"Roaming feature, application control and firewall features."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use and the full reach of services."
"I would like to see improvements made to the dashboard, where you can get the information with a simple click."
"The packet analyzer needs improvement."
"Technical support is a little slow."
"I would like to see it integrate with third-party systems."
More IronNet Collective Defense Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Aruba IntroSpect is ranked 16th in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) while IronNet Collective Defense Platform is ranked 14th in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA). Aruba IntroSpect is rated 8.6, while IronNet Collective Defense Platform is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Aruba IntroSpect writes "A straightforward setup for technical users and an overall good product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IronNet Collective Defense Platform writes "Easy to use, stable, and easy to install". Aruba IntroSpect is most compared with Arista NDR, Cisco Secure Network Analytics, LogRhythm UEBA, Darktrace and SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer, whereas IronNet Collective Defense Platform is most compared with Darktrace and ExtraHop Reveal(x).
See our list of best Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) vendors.
We monitor all Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.