We performed a comparison between Aruba Networks Wireless WAN and HPE Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Its most valuable feature is the ease of use."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of setup and deployment."
"The GUI offered by the product is good."
"In the event of a controller appliance failure or downtime, the system seamlessly transitions control to any access point acting as a backup controller."
"The most valuable feature of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is centralized management. It has features like other solutions, but it's easier to manage. Aruba Networks Wireless WAN also has a tax asset benefit which is good."
"The product gives good stability and concurrency."
"Aruba is a very stable system."
"I believe their Adaptive Radio Management (ARM) in its current form provides the best automated management of transmit power and channel. It does a really good job of managing proper design and wireless environment."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is flexibility."
"The main benefit of this product is the lifetime warranty, up to 99 years. For example, if your switch card fails after 10 years, and the hardware fails, it will be replaced with the very same switch or the equivalent model available at the time."
"Setting up the solution initially is very easy."
"The most valuable features of HPE Wireless WAN are high quality and capability."
"HPE Wireless is easy to use. Integration is not an issue. It is easy to integrate HPE Wireless with any operating system and other brands of switches."
"The performance is good."
"It is a good and stable solution."
"The reliability is good."
"The internet signal and the connection can be better."
"Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is expensive."
"The integration, pricing, and configuration could always be improved upon."
"The issue is that we are unable to update it because we lack the necessary permissions. We set up the website, but we don't have permission to download the software."
"The solution currently has a Windows update problem."
"We have had stability issues with some types of portable devices."
"Sometimes, the configuration part of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN can be complex, and if you fail to understand the product at once, you may not even know about some features that you can apply to your network, and they may go unused."
"If they provided more updates that would be ideal."
"The license cost of the product is an area where the prices are neither expensive nor cheap, leaving a scope for the prices to be lowered further."
"Technical support could be improved. They could respond a bit faster."
"I would say that the integration with other vendors in areas such as management or the visibility of other vendors in the management tools could be improved."
"HPE should improve performance and stability."
"It's very old-fashioned, which is why we have made the decision to replace it."
"Sometimes it can be difficult to find the right sizing."
"HPE Wireless WAN could provide better access points and better pricing."
"In the next release of the solution, there should be better integration with other platforms."
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 5th in Wireless WAN with 46 reviews while HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 8th in Wireless WAN with 16 reviews. Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.4, while HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN writes "It's reliable, cost-effective, and easy to troubleshoot". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Ubiquiti Wireless, Fortinet FortiWLM and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, whereas HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN. See our Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs. HPE Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.