We performed a comparison between Aruba Networks Wireless WAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is stable and good."
"The most valuable feature is reliability."
"In the event of a controller appliance failure or downtime, the system seamlessly transitions control to any access point acting as a backup controller."
"Aruba is a very stable system."
"The solution's strong security mechanism and user-friendly web console are great."
"The product keeps up with leading-edge technology so we have dependability and scalability."
"From the performance perspective, I'm happy with the solution. Also, from the technical side, it seems to be pretty good."
"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"Wireless six is the most valuable feature of this solution right now. It has supported the most recent laptop model."
"It’s reliable."
"Ruckus has multiple radios. Therefore, it supports high speed for users and clients. Other vendors have fluctuations in speed. The main thing about Ruckus is that you can trust it and rely on its speed. I am simply satisfied with it."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN is an easy-to-use solution."
"The most valuable features are the ease of deployment, the coverage that it offers, and the reliability."
"Scalability is a valuable feature."
"The feature I like most, is the product activity."
"The deployment access in the local system is about 200 access points. External access points is more. The number is huge. There about 1,000 users in total."
"The product offers a feature that pinpoints where the devices are to help users find them easily if they want to know where a laptop or tablet is, but it is a feature that needs improvements due to some shortcomings."
"It would be better for customers if Aruba provided more license options, like 5-year licenses"
"The internet signal and the connection can be better."
"We do not have direct access to Aruba’s Mesh portal."
"This solution needs different models that are more specialized for certain customers."
"In the next release, the security should be improved by including support for WPA3."
"Deployment can take some time if you haven't planned well."
"Technical support is important to me and I feel that it is something that can be improved."
"The connectivity and mobility for users could be improved."
"Pricing is an area for improvement. The devices are relatively expensive."
"The controller could be made less complicated, so those who are less technically sound can maintain it."
"This product needs a point-to-point, bridge solution."
"I would like to see built-in Wi-Fi."
"Integration with AirMagnet, the design software, would be good because it takes the layout of a building and positions the access points accordingly, based on the areas and the construction materials."
"What needs improvement in Ruckus Wireless WAN is the initial setup. It could be easier. Availability is also another area for improvement in the product. Another huge disadvantage of Ruckus Wireless WAN is the cost you must continuously pay for the licenses."
"Of course, we'd always like it to be cheaper, but that's for every product."
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 5th in Wireless WAN with 46 reviews while Ruckus Wireless WAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless WAN with 45 reviews. Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.4, while Ruckus Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN writes "It's reliable, cost-effective, and easy to troubleshoot". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless WAN writes " Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement". Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Ubiquiti Wireless, Fortinet FortiWLM and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, whereas Ruckus Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and HPE Wireless WAN. See our Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.