We performed a comparison between Aruba Remote Access Points and Citrix Gateway based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The product is very flexible. So far the stability of the solution has been good."
"Aruba works well in large spaces, especially for manufacturing. That's when you start seeing the effectiveness of Aruba."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is experienced by those working at home since they get a secure Wi-Fi connection."
"Aruba Remote Access Points provide a level of protection for our IPs."
"The platform has the most valuable advanced filtering feature."
"I can use the solution from my home or any remote office to access printers, servers, etc."
"The authentication features are valuable."
"It’s very light."
"The stability of the solution is perfect."
"I didn't have any hiccups or issues with it."
"The solution is scalable and can go from a very small deployment to handling 10,000 transactions a second."
"We can maintain our systems using the solution."
"The solution has very flexible configuration."
"Citrix Gateway is stable once I am connected."
"The solution is very stable. If I were to rate it out of ten, I would give stability a nine."
"The solution is scalable."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"The security side of Aruba Remote Access Points could be improved."
"The remote access point coverage should be bigger than it is now."
"I use the controller when using Aruba Remote Access Points, particularly during configuration. Hence, room for improvement in Aruba Remote Access Points is for its web UI to be easier to control."
"It could have better monitoring features."
"Its scalability capabilities should be improved."
"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing. If they can be more competitive."
"The solution's technical support has some shortcomings that need improvement."
"The product needs an increased level of security for the end user."
"The initial setup could be made easier."
"The load balancing could be improved."
"If the solution had a more advanced DNS, it would be an improvement."
"We are currently looking at automation. It would be good if there is some way to automate it in a fast way. It should be easy to automate. It also has some security issues."
"We have experienced issues relating to multi-factor authentication"
"As an organization, our initiative is to move to the cloud, Citrix Gateway needs to improve its cloud capabilities and make the cloud solution more robust."
"Sometimes the input-output has issues."
"The major issue is price. I would also like them to make other aspects more accessible."
Aruba Remote Access Points is ranked 13th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 12 reviews while Citrix Gateway is ranked 11th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 33 reviews. Aruba Remote Access Points is rated 7.8, while Citrix Gateway is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Aruba Remote Access Points writes "The solution can be used from home or any remote office to access office resources like printers and servers". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Citrix Gateway writes "Provided the ability for remote work during the pandemic". Aruba Remote Access Points is most compared with Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Fortinet FortiClient, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and OpenVPN Access Server, whereas Citrix Gateway is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), Fortinet FortiClient, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Ivanti Connect Secure and Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client. See our Aruba Remote Access Points vs. Citrix Gateway report.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
