We performed a comparison between Aruba Virtual Intranet Access and Check Point Remote Access VPN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"The solution is very user friendly."
"The most important feature of Check Point Remote Access VPN is the multiple factor authentication."
"The secure hotspot access for enabling good network connectivity is great."
"The biggest advantage of Check Point Remote Access VPN is that we already use the Check Point firewall. We only needed to enable the feature and do the configuration in order to enable the VPN feature. We didn't need to buy or manage new hardware."
"Among its most valuable features is how it quickly and easily connects everyone to the VPN service."
"The management of the solution is very simple. It allows for a single view of all the endpoints."
"The solution implemented in the cloud allows us to easily scale in cases of user increase."
"It is easy to install the Endpoint Remote Access VPN client on different platforms."
"The ability to create your trigger data domains is the solution's most valuable feature."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Configurations can be a bit complex."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN could be more user-friendly."
"When you need to create something, you have to follow many steps and I think that should be simplified."
"In my organization, there aren't Linux users, however, I know it has difficulties offering secure access for customers who use this operating system."
"Improved scalability would allow the solution to handle larger numbers of users and devices without a significant impact on performance."
"Connection of devices from various locations is efficient though there are a few challenges when there is a network failure."
"The maximum it is giving us is only 5 licenses and if you need more, they must be purchased separately."
"They could add more features, like the security to block off the doors, or create another hatch, something like this. They could make the features safer, add malware to make my mail and the Kryon system safer and to protect data at an earlier stage."
"It would be good to have Remote Access VPN solutions for Check Point edge services."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is ranked 31st in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review while Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 6th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 57 reviews. Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is rated 7.0, while Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Aruba Virtual Intranet Access writes "Very user friendly but configurations can be a bit complex". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Ivanti Connect Secure and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Harmony Mobile, Fortinet FortiClient and Zscaler Private Access.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.