We performed a comparison between Aruba Virtual Intranet Access and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution is very user friendly."
"Traffic Learning is the most valuable feature."
"Stable and scalable network traffic management solution for applications. It has good performance."
"The combination of ADC and WAN is good."
"The tech support we got from F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager directly was pretty good."
"Tech support has been very quick to respond to all of the needs that we've had. If you want ad-hoc support. They also provide professional services that you can purchase as well."
"The most helpful thing is that it's open-source. It's very easy to program and customize."
"It supports APIs and virtual additions for cloud and VMware."
"The value and impact of using F5 BIG-IP LTM for application delivery control in our organization are significant."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Configurations can be a bit complex."
"For integration with other AWS environments, we do some tie-ins with some autoscaling groups. This has been challenging for us. We have had issues, where when autoscaling groups scale up, there are some instances which are not showing up in the proper size. Then, those IPs would get registered with F5, but never get released. Therefore, we are ending up with a whole bunch of ghosted IPs."
"F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is expensive. Pricing needs to be improved."
"We would like to see load balancing between the cloud and the on-premise, a straightforward deployment feature."
"BIG-IP LTM's sandboxing integration could be improved."
"One area for improvement with F5 BIG-IP LTM could be its pricing, which some may find on the higher side."
"My only point of contention would be that it is a little pricey."
"It would possibly help to get more training, even better in local languages."
"Improvements should enable customers to build a tailor-made solution in the future through a service portal."
More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is ranked 31st in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review while F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is ranked 1st in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 116 reviews. Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is rated 7.0, while F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Aruba Virtual Intranet Access writes "Very user friendly but configurations can be a bit complex". On the other hand, the top reviewer of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) writes "Helps deliver applications to users in a reliable, secure, and optimized way". Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Ivanti Connect Secure and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is most compared with Citrix NetScaler, Fortinet FortiADC, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, NGINX Plus and HAProxy.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
