• Home
  • Aruba Virtual Intranet Access vs. MegaPath MPLS VPN [EOL]

Aruba Virtual Intranet Access vs MegaPath MPLS VPN [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Netgate Logo

Netgate TNSR

Read 2 Netgate TNSR reviews
63 views|25 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
HPE Aruba Networking Logo

Aruba Virtual Intranet Access

Read 1 Aruba Virtual Intranet Access review
354 views|296 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Fusion Connect Logo

MegaPath MPLS VPN [EOL]

views| comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aruba Virtual Intranet Access and MegaPath MPLS VPN [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Harish (Kumar)
Good gateway with helpful traffic shaping and load balancing
The Netgate 6100 Max Model is equipped with pfSense Plus software. We configured it last week and replaced the Mikrotik router. There are many... Read more →
Anonymous User
Very user friendly but configurations can be a bit complex
Use MegaPath MPLS VPN [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is not a license required for this solution but the price should be less expensive."

    • More Netgate TNSR Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Netgate TNSR?
    Top Answer:It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled.
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netgate TNSR?
    Top Answer:The product is very cost-effective and has no requirement for additional licenses. The setup is not easy. Users need… more »
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Netgate TNSR?
    Top Answer:THe solution is used as a primary gateway with two lease lines of 450 Mbps total. Around 200 users are under it. There… more »
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What do you like most about Aruba Virtual Intranet Access?
    Top Answer:The solution is very user friendly.
    What needs improvement with Aruba Virtual Intranet Access?
    Top Answer:Configurations can be a bit complex.
    What is your primary use case for Aruba Virtual Intranet Access?
    Top Answer:We use the solution to access company information via the cloud.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    TNSR
    Aruba VIA
    MegaPath IPsec VPN
    Learn More
    Netgate
    HPE Aruba Networking
    Fusion Connect
    Overview

    TNSR is an advanced open source-based secure networking software platform with highly-scalable packet processing, manageability, and service expansion capabilities. This video provides a high-level introduction. that address a number of commonly asked new product questions - in just a couple of minutes.

    The Virtual Intranet Access (VIA) client from Aruba provides secure remote network connectivity for Android, Apple iOS, Mac OS X, Linux and Windows devices.

    MegaPath IPsec VPN delivers a Layer 7 deep-packet inspection engine that shapes network traffic, blocking evasive and encrypted applications including Peer-to-Peer. Built for today’s multi-use networks, VPN service helps ensure that your business internet serves your business needs. It throttles bandwidth hogs like Netflix and BitTorrent, and prioritizes real-time productivity apps like VoIP.

    Sample Customers
    UCLA, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, shopify
    VERISK
    UnumProvident
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Government10%
    Media Company10%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise49%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is ranked 31st in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review while MegaPath MPLS VPN [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is rated 7.0, while MegaPath MPLS VPN [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Aruba Virtual Intranet Access writes "Very user friendly but configurations can be a bit complex". On the other hand, Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Ivanti Connect Secure and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas MegaPath MPLS VPN [EOL] is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server.

    See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.