Compare Aruba Virtual Intranet Access vs. Sangfor SSL VPN

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: November 2020.
447,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The pricing is good and the standard license allows for 30 users."

More Sangfor SSL VPN Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
447,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
387
Comparisons
313
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
442
Comparisons
284
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
344
Avg. Rating
9.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Also Known As
Aruba VIA
Learn
Aruba Networks
Sangfor
Overview

The Virtual Intranet Access (VIA) client from Aruba provides secure remote network connectivity for Android, Apple iOS, Mac OS X, Linux and Windows devices.

Sangfor SSL VPN provides support for remote user to access the enterprise network from anywhere as long as you are connected to the Internet. Remote access is provided through a Secure Socket Layer (SSL) enabled by a SSL VPN gateway. The SSL VPN gateway allows remote users to establish a secure Virtual Private Network (VPN) tunnel using a web browser. This feature provides a comprehensive solution that allows easy access to a broad range of web resources and web-enabled applications (e.g.: Easy Connect) using native HTTP over SSL (HTTPS) browser support.

Sangfor SSL VPN provides SSL VPN remote-access connectivity from almost any Internet-enabled location using a web browser or a APP that natively support SSL encryption. This feature allows your Company to extend access to its secure enterprise network to any authorized user by providing remote-access connectivity to corporate resources.

Offer
Learn more about Aruba Virtual Intranet Access
Learn more about Sangfor SSL VPN
Sample Customers
VERISKInvestcorp, Central Bancorp, Griffiths & Armour
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: November 2020.
447,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is ranked 23rd in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN while Sangfor SSL VPN is ranked 13th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review. Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is rated 0.0, while Sangfor SSL VPN is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sangfor SSL VPN writes "Good reporting, provides several options for restricting access, and the technical support is good". Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is most compared with Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, F5 BIG-IP, OpenVPN Access Server and Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN, whereas Sangfor SSL VPN is most compared with Peplink SpeedFusion, F5 BIG-IP, SonicWall SMA, Cisco IOS SSL VPN and Pulse Connect Secure.

See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.