Compare Aruba Virtual Intranet Access vs. SecureLink

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"We are not happy with the recent increase in the price."

More SecureLink Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The most valuable feature is synchronizing the limited access for partners or sub-contractors.
Top Answer: The price needs to be lower. We are not happy with the recent increase in the price.
Top Answer: We would like to be to secure access to all of the servers for all of the internal workers and engineers. We would like to have tools that provide us with security for our servers. I would like to see… more »
Ranking
Views
418
Comparisons
340
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
615
Comparisons
409
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
305
Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Aruba VIA
Learn More
Overview

The Virtual Intranet Access (VIA) client from Aruba provides secure remote network connectivity for Android, Apple iOS, Mac OS X, Linux and Windows devices.

SecureLink is the leader in managing secure third-party remote access and remote support for enterprise organizations and technology vendors. More than 30,000 world-class companies across multiple highly regulated industries, including healthcare, retail, government, financial, legal and gaming, rely on SecureLink’s purpose-built platform to securely control network access, ensure industry compliance, manage audit trails, decrease time to resolution, and reduce liability.

The company was founded in 2003 and is based in Austin, Texas with a second office in Costa Rica.
Offer
Learn more about Aruba Virtual Intranet Access
Learn more about SecureLink
Sample Customers
VERISK
NISC, Sotera Wireless, InterSystems, Allscripts, Cerner, Allscripts
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider28%
Computer Software Company26%
Educational Organization9%
Wholesaler/Distributor6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Healthcare Company14%
Comms Service Provider12%
Government7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: June 2021.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is ranked 26th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN while SecureLink is ranked 19th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review. Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is rated 0.0, while SecureLink is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SecureLink writes "Efficient technical support with good synchronization features, but it needs better security". Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Check Point Remote Access VPN and F5 BIG-IP, whereas SecureLink is most compared with Zscaler Private Access, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, F5 BIG-IP, Citrix Gateway and OpenVPN Access Server.

See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.