Compare Aruba Virtual Intranet Access vs. SonicWall Netextender

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"After a certain number of users, you require extra licensing.""You have to pay for its license. There are some other companies that provide a VPN client for free. When you buy NetExtender, its license is available for one, three, or five years."

More SonicWall Netextender Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: It allows us to work remotely.
Top Answer: After a certain number of users, you require extra licensing. I don't remember how much it costs, but I remember it wasn't expensive.
Top Answer: I am rolling out the new Netextender because I am having some issues with the older version. If I update the client with the newer version, the issues will go away.
Ranking
Views
418
Comparisons
340
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
1,274
Comparisons
1,148
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
515
Rating
8.5
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Aruba VIA
Learn More
Overview

The Virtual Intranet Access (VIA) client from Aruba provides secure remote network connectivity for Android, Apple iOS, Mac OS X, Linux and Windows devices.

-Enforce granular access policies and extend network access through native clients
-Enhance firewall encryption and security by redirecting all client traffic through VPN
-Reduce administrative overhead by simplifying remote access management

Offer
Learn more about Aruba Virtual Intranet Access
Learn more about SonicWall Netextender
Sample Customers
VERISK
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider28%
Computer Software Company28%
Educational Organization9%
Wholesaler/Distributor6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider27%
Computer Software Company16%
Government7%
Educational Organization6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: June 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is ranked 26th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN while SonicWall Netextender is ranked 12th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 3 reviews. Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is rated 0.0, while SonicWall Netextender is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonicWall Netextender writes "Easy to use, reasonably priced, stable, and the support is good". Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Check Point Remote Access VPN and F5 BIG-IP, whereas SonicWall Netextender is most compared with SonicWall Mobile Connect, OpenVPN Access Server, SonicWall Connect Tunnel, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client and Fortinet FortiClient.

See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.