Compare Arxan Application Protection vs. Checkmarx

Arxan Application Protection is ranked 35th in Application Security while Checkmarx is ranked 5th in Application Security with 6 reviews. Arxan Application Protection is rated 0, while Checkmarx is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Checkmarx writes "Works well with Windows servers but no Linux support and takes too long to scan files". Arxan Application Protection is most compared with , whereas Checkmarx is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode and Micro Focus Fortify on Demand.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Veracode Logo
58,372 views|31,073 comparisons
Arxan Application Protection Logo
105 views|36 comparisons
Checkmarx Logo
45,633 views|28,969 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Arxan Application Protection? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, SonarQube, Sonatype and others in Application Security. Updated: March 2020.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.Veracode has been fair. We use their SaaS solution and it's just an annual subscription.No issues, the pricing seems reasonable.It is pricey. There is a lot of value in the product, but it is a costly tool.I recommend going for a one-year licensing with CA, because currently they are the leaders in this field with more features and a much better turn around time with a cheaper position, but there are a lot of new companies coming up in the market and they are building up their platforms.Costs are reasonable. No special infrastructure is required and the license model is good.I think the pricing is in line with the rest of the tools. I think you get what you pay for. It is certainly not inexpensive, but the value proposition is there. There are certainly cheaper tools, but I don't think we'd be getting the support that we get with those, and that is what separates this product from the others.

Read more »

Information Not Available
We have a subscription license that is on a yearly basis, and it's a pretty competitive solution.It is an expensive solution.Be cautious of the one-year subscription date. Once it expires, your price will go up.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security solutions are best for your needs.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 50% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 41% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Learn
Veracode
Video Not Available
Arxan
Checkmarx
Overview

Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.

Arxan Application Protection shields apps from reverse engineering and tampering and detects threats in real time to protect businesses from brand damage, financial loss, intellectual property theft and government penalties.

Checkmarx CxSAST is a highly accurate and flexible Static Code Analysis product that allows organizations to automatically scan un-compiled / un-built code and identify hundreds of security vulnerabilities in all major coding languages. CxSAST is available as a standalone product and can be effectively integrated into the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) to streamline detection and remediation. CxSAST can be deployed on-premise in a private data center or hosted via a public cloud.

Whitepaper: I, II

Offer
Keep your software secure

Application security starts with secure code. Find out more about the benefits of using Veracode to keep your software secure throughout the development lifecycle.

Learn more about Arxan Application Protection
Learn more about Checkmarx
Sample Customers
State of Missouri, Rekner
Information Not Available
YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm31%
Insurance Company15%
Retailer8%
Consumer Goods8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company40%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm6%
Media Company6%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm57%
Software R&D Company14%
Engineering Company14%
Comms Service Provider14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company38%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm10%
Media Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise55%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise74%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise44%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise66%
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, SonarQube, Sonatype and others in Application Security. Updated: March 2020.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.