Digital.ai Application Security vs Synopsys Defensics comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Digital.ai Logo
343 views|246 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Synopsys Logo
197 views|121 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Digital.ai Application Security and Synopsys Defensics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I used the tool to prepare for the interview as a Business Developer. It helped me improve my understanding on software security."

More Digital.ai Application Security Pros →

"The product is related to US usage with TLS contact fees, i.e. how more data center connections will help lower networking costs.""Whatever the test suit they give, it is intelligent. It will understand the protocol and it will generate the test cases based on the protocol: protocol, message sequence, protocol, message structure... Because of that, we can eliminate a lot of unwanted test cases, so we can execute the tests and complete them very quickly.""We have found multiple issues in our embedded system network protocols, related to buffer overflow. We have reduced some of these issues."

More Synopsys Defensics Pros →

Cons
"I would like the tool to integrate AI and automation that is dedicated to detecting software vulnerabilities."

More Digital.ai Application Security Cons →

"Sometimes, when we are testing embedded devices, when we trigger the test cases, the target will crash immediately. It is very difficult for us to identify the root cause of the crash because they do not provide sophisticated tools on the target side. They cover only the client-side application... They do not have diagnostic tools for the target side. Rather, they have them but they are very minimal and not very helpful.""It does not support the complete protocol stack. There are some IoT protocols that are not supported and new protocols that are not supported.""Codenomicon Defensics should be more advanced for the testing sector. It should be somewhat easy and flexible to install."

More Synopsys Defensics Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:I used the tool to prepare for the interview as a Business Developer. It helped me improve my understanding on software security.
Top Answer:I would like the tool to integrate AI and automation that is dedicated to detecting software vulnerabilities.
Top Answer:I used the tool to prepare for the interview as a Business Developer. It helped me improve my understanding on software security.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
343
Comparisons
246
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
155
Rating
6.0
5th
out of 5 in Fuzz Testing Tools
Views
197
Comparisons
121
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Arxan Application Protection, Digital.ai Application Protection
Defensics, Codenomicon Defensics
Learn More
Overview

Our proprietary protection capabilities shield apps from reverse engineering, tampering, API exploits, and other attacks that can put your business, your customers, and your bottom line at risk.

DefensicsĀ® fuzz testing is a comprehensive, powerful, and automated black box solution that enables organizations to effectively and efficiently discover and remediate security weaknesses in software. By taking a systematic and intelligent approach to negative testing, Defensics allows organizations to ensure software security without compromising on product innovation, increasing time to market, or inflating operational costs.

Sample Customers
Valencell
Coriant, CERT-FI, Next Generation Networks
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm20%
Computer Software Company16%
Construction Company9%
Government9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company22%
Manufacturing Company15%
Financial Services Firm7%
University6%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise72%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise73%
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Digital.ai Application Security is ranked 36th in Application Security Tools with 1 review while Synopsys Defensics is ranked 5th in Fuzz Testing Tools. Digital.ai Application Security is rated 6.0, while Synopsys Defensics is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Digital.ai Application Security writes "Helps to improve knowledge on software security ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Synopsys Defensics writes "Technical support provided protocol-specific documentation to prove that some positives were not false". Digital.ai Application Security is most compared with SonarQube, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Fortify Application Defender, whereas Synopsys Defensics is most compared with SonarQube, Snyk, Fortify on Demand, Invicti and HCL AppScan.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.