We performed a comparison between Digital.ai Application Security and Kiuwan based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools."I used the tool to prepare for the interview as a Business Developer. It helped me improve my understanding on software security."
"It provides value by offering options to enhance both code quality and the security of the company."
"The feature that I have found the most valuable in Kiuwan is the speed of scanning. Compared to other SaaS tools I have used, Kiuwan is much quicker in performing scans. I have not yet used it on a large code base, but from what I have experienced, it is efficient and accurate. Additionally, I have used it both manually and in an automated pipeline, and both methods have been effective. The speed of scanning is what makes it valuable to me."
"The solution offers very good technical support."
"I like that I can scan the code without sending it to the Kiuwan cloud. I can do it locally on my device. When the local analyzer finishes, the results display on the dashboard in the cloud. It's essential for security purposes to be able to scan my code locally."
"I like that it provides a detailed report that lets you know the risk index and the vulnerability."
"I find it immensely helpful because it's not just about generating code; it's about ensuring efficiency in the execution."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report."
"I have found the security and QA in the source code to be most valuable."
"I would like the tool to integrate AI and automation that is dedicated to detecting software vulnerabilities."
"Perhaps more languages supported."
"It could improve its scalability abilities."
"I would like to see additional languages supported."
"I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution."
"In Kiuwan there are sometimes duplicates found in the dependency scan under the "insights" tab. It's unclear to me why these duplicates are appearing, and it would be helpful if the application teams could investigate further."
"The QA developer and security could be improved."
"The next release should include more flexibility in the reporting."
"The solution seems to give us a lot of false positives. This could be improved quite a bit."
Digital.ai Application Security is ranked 36th in Application Security Tools with 1 review while Kiuwan is ranked 21st in Application Security Tools with 23 reviews. Digital.ai Application Security is rated 6.0, while Kiuwan is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Digital.ai Application Security writes "Helps to improve knowledge on software security ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kiuwan writes "Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement". Digital.ai Application Security is most compared with SonarQube, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Fortify Application Defender, whereas Kiuwan is most compared with SonarQube, Checkmarx, Fortify on Demand, Veracode and Snyk.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.