We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and Mobius Content Services Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Liferay and others in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals)."Atlassian Confluence is flexible and allows adding different types of context on the page and connecting a hypertext, like a web page, without a source."
"The solution is very intuitive and provides excellent content management."
"Great shareable and co-editing features."
"Pricing is not a problem."
"It integrates well with other Atlassian products"
"It's easy to search for information."
"It seems highly scalable. There are 500 end users using this solution."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"This solution has improved our organization by providing a central repository for business data with control over sensitive data."
"It provides a single pane of glass for delivering content from multiple repositories. It is also highly recommended because of the ease of use when it comes to searching and retrieving from multiple repositories simultaneously."
"The flexibility and simplicity of this solution could be improved. We would also like the ability to add plugins."
"The UX is a little bit all over the place."
"Confluence cannot replace Microsoft Word at the moment, so even though it can be used as a document management system, it is not meant for document creation, which adds a lot of limitations to it."
"I would like Confluence to include the ability to draw flowcharts and diagrams."
"The one way in which this solution could be improved is by offering better design and UI."
"There needs to be a flexible pricing model, where we can pick and choose services and customize our pricing model."
"There could be an option to collaborate with other users while editing the documents."
"Some macros can be technical, and they are better managed on the Confluence cloud rather than on-premises. For example, when you add an image on the cloud, you can resize it just by using the mouse. This is not the case on-premises yet. You have to write pixels of the size of the image sometimes. Some of the very old macros are still there, and some of them are technical. It can be hard for users if they are not from an IT background to understand how to use them quickly."
"Sales and service need to be more consistent."
"The setup and the support could be improved when it comes to populating the reports from a mainframe environment."
More Mobius Content Services Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 99 reviews while Mobius Content Services Platform is ranked 12th in Enterprise Content Management with 3 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while Mobius Content Services Platform is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mobius Content Services Platform writes "Time from creation to access is much better, as reports are immediately available upon generation". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Office 365, Microsoft OneDrive, SharePoint and Zendesk, whereas Mobius Content Services Platform is most compared with IBM ECM, IBM FileNet, SharePoint, OpenText Extended ECM and Alfresco.
We monitor all Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
