Mobius Content Services Platform vs SharePoint comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Rocket Software Logo
1,115 views|388 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
7,894 views|6,463 comparisons
77% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Mobius Content Services Platform and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It provides a single pane of glass for delivering content from multiple repositories. It is also highly recommended because of the ease of use when it comes to searching and retrieving from multiple repositories simultaneously.""This solution has improved our organization by providing a central repository for business data with control over sensitive data."

More Mobius Content Services Platform Pros →

"It allows for simultaneous users to be on it.""It offers ease of use, which is crucial.""Information is now available instantly to managers on all devices.""Its functionality is enormous.""The initial setup is easy.""The most valuable features are the Integrations, web site, and search.""It facilitates collaboration and the ability to create custom workflows.""This solution has helped us with the categorization, organization, management, discovery, and delivery of program and project related information."

More SharePoint Pros →

Cons
"The setup and the support could be improved when it comes to populating the reports from a mainframe environment.""Sales and service need to be more consistent."

More Mobius Content Services Platform Cons →

"SharePoint designer workflows can be buggy sometimes without any apparent reason.""The product does not perform 100% when used outside of a Microsoft based browser, Chrome, Firefox, etc.""SharePoint sometimes cannot handle the amount of co-editing that we do.""The workflow engine cannot support the business needs.""During uptime under our network, it is hard to find info when content is hefty.""The limitations and boundaries must be extended.""The areas of this solution that need improvement are the relationships between lists, cross-site web parts, and page-building tools.""You still need a bit of expertise to add branding."

More SharePoint Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing and licensing are commensurate with other solutions in the market that handle a distributed system environment."
  • More Mobius Content Services Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "As usual, Microsoft’s licensing structures don’t really seem to fit the needs of their products. This leads to always paying for a project you will never use fully or always be adding to."
  • "Licensing can be by server or by seat."
  • "It is very expensive.​"
  • "The data classification and search elements are cheap."
  • "The replacement costs for it are cheaper if you use only SharePoint."
  • "We have purchased add-ons to handle multiple site collections, form creation, and design."
  • "The cost is expensive, but worthwhile."
  • "The pricing works for us."
  • More SharePoint Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a round-up of a couple of the more well known platforms and compare their products to Drupal. In this roundup we will be comparing Jive, Sharepoint and Drupal Commons. Drupal Commons is a popular distribution created by Acquia to compete with some of these other proprietary platforms. There are many other options out there, commercial and otherwise, to compare with Drupal but I want to focus on Jive and Sharepoint for a couple of reasons. I chose Jive because it is one of the leading competitors in this space in respect to market share. Next, I chose Sharepoint because I have some history with Sharepoint. This experience dates back to when I built www.adhe.edu with Sharepoint 2007 a few years ago. I subsequently wrote this blog entry about my experience shortly after joining Mediacurrent. This roundup will also act as a refresher for those who read my original “Drupal vs. Sharepoint” blog. Yammer, which was recently bought by Microsoft and is the tool we currently use for office communication will also get some mentions throughout this article. As I went through and tested each of these tools I used three main criteria in my evaluation Cost Ability to Customize Overall features… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:There are several systems that are capable of providing security at a document level, with encryption a rest, and a robust API. But as far as granularity goes, I don't see much else being able to… more »
    Top Answer:It provides a single pane of glass for delivering content from multiple repositories. It is also highly recommended because of the ease of use when it comes to searching and retrieving from multiple… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing and licensing are commensurate with other solutions in the market that handle a distributed system environment.
    Top Answer:Alfresco scores are high on all features of an ECM solution and tools.   Back office processing, rated as 3.36 good.  Business Process Application 3.55 Good to excellent.  Document Management 4.12… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing is competitive. That's why almost all the companies are using SharePoint. I rate the pricing a ten out of ten. When we buy the license, the person buying must be well-educated on how the… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,115
    Comparisons
    388
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    687
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    7,894
    Comparisons
    6,463
    Reviews
    17
    Average Words per Review
    562
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ASG Mobius, ASG ViewDirect
    SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010
    Learn More
    Rocket Software
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Mobius is an intelligent information management solution that delivers
    content services with a granular policy management foundation to manage the
    life cycle of enterprise content and data in accordance with corporate policies,
    industry regulations and government mandates at web-scale speeds with accuracy and reliability.

    SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow.

    Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around.

    Sample Customers
    Liberty Mutual
    Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Insurance Company13%
    Government8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    University8%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government12%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise75%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Content Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Mobius Content Services Platform is ranked 12th in Enterprise Content Management with 3 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 146 reviews. Mobius Content Services Platform is rated 7.4, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Mobius Content Services Platform writes "Time from creation to access is much better, as reports are immediately available upon generation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Mobius Content Services Platform is most compared with IBM ECM, IBM FileNet, OpenText Extended ECM and Alfresco, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and WordPress.

    See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.