We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare ASG-TMON Performance Analyzer vs. Control-M

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpCon Logo
Read 46 OpCon reviews.
6,081 views|1,259 comparisons
ASG-TMON Performance Analyzer Logo
71 views|32 comparisons
Control-M Logo
29,741 views|13,213 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, SMA Technologies, Advanced Systems Concepts and others in Workload Automation. Updated: November 2021.
554,382 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The pricing is over $100,000 for our credit union and I believe it's $89,000 for our clients, in total, annually.""Cost depends on your environment. We are doing stuff now with failover and recovery, so we have boosted our costs.""Our annual maintenance costs are $45,000. The initial cost is separate.""On a yearly basis our cost is between $25,000 and $30,000.""It's definitely worth the cost.""Scaling is pricey.""Our license is for 1000 jobs. Including support, the license and upgrades are 2000 euros a month.""We currently renewed with one of their new technology bundles. It's around $36,000 annually. We run a query of our SQL in our SQL database to see how many jobs we run. They're charging us per usage and whatever add-ons you want to use with OpCon."

More OpCon Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"The annual licensing within BMC Control-M is on a per task basis. Three- and five-year contracts are also offered. The customer usually buys a bundle of tasks, e.g., 5,000 tasks, then my team configures Control-M for their usage.""This is now from my previous years as support for banks and big companies. If it's not enterprise scale, I find that it's too expensive for smaller companies. You really have to be quite big and need to have a dedicated support staff to run it, then you'll be fine. What we've seen at smaller companies, it's too expensive because they want to automate everything. Now, stuff that can literally run once a day for the rest of their lives is costing them $3 a job a day. It becomes too expensive, eventually. They are not seeing the return on investment because it's not business critical. Nobody is going to die or they're going to lose money if that job didn't run exactly at 11 minutes past 4:00. It's definitely for bigger enterprise companies, especially banks or healthcare providers. We have had an instance where Control-M was unavailable due to external factors for 20 minutes and there was a loss of almost a million euros because the solution involved logistics.""You're going to spend a lot of money upfront, but the benefits you're going to get out of it are going to quickly pay for it.""Initially, our licensing model was based on the number of jobs per day. That caused some issues because we were restricted to a number. So at our renewal time we said, 'We want to convert from number of jobs to number of endpoints.' That cost us extra money but it gave us additional capabilities, without worrying about the number of jobs.""There are two different types of licenses available. The first is based on the number of jobs that we run per day, and the other is based on the number of agents that we install. My current project has a contract for five years.""BMC's price is based on the number of jobs.""The cost of the hardware is high. Because you need to license each job, it is costly.""The pricing of Control-M is reasonable."

More Control-M Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
554,382 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Often times there are criteria that cannot be determined by the system, which allows a human to make the determination… more »
Top Answer: This tool, like any other quality product, fits the idea of "You get what you pay for." The SMA Technologies consultants… more »
Top Answer: The products are extremely powerful and capable. Anytime you have such capability, the programming/configuration that… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful… more »
Top Answer: Hi! I don't know the "Oracle DAC Scheduler", but I can say that in most competitive solutions Control-m stands out in… more »
Top Answer: Control-M has helped to improve our data transfers because it allows us to monitor the execution of the process. With… more »
Comparisons
Also Known As
ASG-PERFMAN, ASG-TMON PA, TMON PA
Control M
Learn More
Overview

OpCon is a robust and flexible platform capable of scaling up to meet the needs of clients running 140,000+ daily jobs across multiple environments and operating systems. Our proven migration framework helps clients painlessly transition from outdated or cost inefficient platforms thanks to our deep organizational expertise, REST API, and extensive library of legacy connectors. We have a variety of consulting options available for clients and offer no-cost training for the life of the contract.

ASG-TMON PA allows you to collect both physical and virtual performance and capacity data across the enterprise and analyze it automatically—making it easy to see where your problems are, where you can improve performance, and to assess what needs to be done to improve your overall IT utilization. (https://www.asg.com/Products/Performance-Management/Capacity-Planning.aspx)

Control-M simplifies application and data workflow orchestration on premises or as a service. It makes it easy to build, define, schedule, manage, and monitor production workflows, ensuring visibility, reliability, and improving SLAs.

  • Accelerate new business applications into production—by embedding workflow orchestration into your CI/CD pipeline
  • Scale Dev and Ops collaboration, with a Jobs-as-Code approach
  • Simplify workflows across hybrid and multi-cloud environments with AWS, Azure and Google Cloud Platform integrations
  • Deliver data-driven outcomes faster, managing big data workflows in a scalable way
  • Take control of your file transfer operations with integrated, intelligent file movement and visibility
Offer
Accel­er­ate dig­i­tal trans­for­ma­tion through work­load automation

Automate repetitive tasks so you can focus on projects that drive your business forward. Find out how OpCon workload automation enables you to create repeatable, reliable workflows - all managed from a single platform.

Learn more about ASG-TMON Performance Analyzer
Learn more about Control-M
Sample Customers
LOHR, Carnival Cruise Lines, Herbalife, Digital Federal Credit Union, Synergent, Frandsen Bank & Trust
Primerica Financial Services
CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm78%
Insurance Company8%
Government4%
Manufacturing Company2%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Financial Services Firm18%
Insurance Company10%
Comms Service Provider9%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm35%
Computer Software Company12%
Retailer8%
Transportation Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Financial Services Firm14%
Comms Service Provider11%
Insurance Company7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise43%
Large Enterprise32%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business56%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise23%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise76%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise82%
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, SMA Technologies, Advanced Systems Concepts and others in Workload Automation. Updated: November 2021.
554,382 professionals have used our research since 2012.

ASG-TMON Performance Analyzer is ranked 29th in Workload Automation while Control-M is ranked 1st in Workload Automation with 36 reviews. ASG-TMON Performance Analyzer is rated 0.0, while Control-M is rated 8.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Control-M writes "Allows us to integrate file transfers more readily, resolve issues quickly, and orchestrate a diverse landscape of vendor products". ASG-TMON Performance Analyzer is most compared with , whereas Control-M is most compared with AutoSys Workload Automation, IBM Workload Automation, Automic Workload Automation, ActiveBatch Workload Automation and Redwood Business Process Automation - Workload Edition.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.