Compare ASG-TMON Performance Analyzer vs. Control-M

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpCon Logo
Read 33 OpCon reviews.
4,059 views|1,016 comparisons
ASG-TMON Performance Analyzer  Logo
40 views|15 comparisons
Control-M Logo
32,574 views|13,714 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use ASG-TMON Performance Analyzer ? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, SMA Technologies, Stonebranch and others in Workload Automation. Updated: October 2020.
442,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"This solution is certainly not the cheapest, but we win in time.""OpCon cost us $80,000 in 2017 money, and that included everything: support, installation, onsite assistance during the conversion, etc. It's been a worthwhile investment by far.""Yearly, it's around $30,000.""Our licensing is on a yearly basis.""Our license is for 1000 jobs. Including support, the license and upgrades are 2000 euros a month.""Yearly, we're paying about $62,000. OpCon has an all-inclusive feature and module license, but you pay per task.""Our annual maintenance costs are $45,000. The initial cost is separate.""On a yearly basis our cost is between $25,000 and $30,000."

More OpCon Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"We have account based licensing. There are two or three types of licensing. One of them is based on the number of jobs, so we a license close to 4,000 jobs per day. The cost is based on the different modules, which we buy from them. If we a buy a hardware module, which we are presently using and integrating, that is an additional cost, but I'm not sure of the amount. Each module comes with a different cost.""As we increase the number of tasks or jobs on the system, there are concerns about cost.""We have a five-year contract with task-based licensing.""This product saves hours in a day based on my experience working here versus other companies with manually operations.""It works on task-based licensing.""Licensing costs are around $3000 a year.""Pricing can be steep, but you get what you pay for."

More Control-M Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
442,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It makes everything simpler. Once OpCon is in, it just repeats itself day after day. We don't have to worry about… more »
Top Answer: Cost depends on your environment. We are doing stuff now with failover and recovery, so we have boosted our costs… more »
Top Answer: There is room for improvement needed around setting up the calendars and frequencies. I would like more flexibility in… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: Please look at Enterprise Management Associates webpage. They are doing kind of deep analysis and comparison of all… more »
Top Answer: Task-based or, alternatively, a fixed number of Agents. Task-based would, I feel, be much more popular in the market. I… more »
Popular Comparisons
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Also Known As
ASG-PERFMAN, ASG-TMON PA, TMON PAControl M
Learn
SMA Technologies
ASG
BMC
Overview

Our founders met at NASA while they were solving some of the toughest IT issues in the world at that time. The work was challenging and required lots of repetitive tasks to maintain NASA’s mainframes and complex IT processes.

Believing that there had to be a better way, they formed SMA Technologies. Since that time, we have been working with the single purpose of unlocking our clients’ potential by streamlining their IT processes and helping employees be more productive by leveraging our automation platform, OpCon.

By freeing them from repetitive tasks, they can focus on doing the critical work that will help them drive the business. No matter the industry, from financial services to aerospace, we are there to help our customers use the power of automation to simplify complex IT issues, enabling them to solve their toughest business challenges.

ASG-TMON PA allows you to collect both physical and virtual performance and capacity data across the enterprise and analyze it automatically—making it easy to see where your problems are, where you can improve performance, and to assess what needs to be done to improve your overall IT utilization. (https://www.asg.com/Products/Performance-Management/Capacity-Planning.aspx)

Control‑M is a digital enterprise management solution that simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment. 

Automate job scheduling and application deployment

  • Connect applications and workflow processes to quickly and reliably deliver business services
  • Realize the potential of big data while freeing IT for other tasks
  • Take control of your file transfer operations with secure scheduling, instant status visibility, and automated recovery
  • Accelerate application change and deployment cycle times with automated application workflow between test and production
  • Empower users to make decisions in real time and perform basic tasks in a view and language they understand
  • Deploy Control-M on-premises or on the cloud
Offer
Accel­er­ate dig­i­tal trans­for­ma­tion through work­load automation

Automate repetitive tasks so you can focus on projects that drive your business forward. Find out how OpCon workload automation enables you to create repeatable, reliable workflows - all managed from a single platform.

Learn more about ASG-TMON Performance Analyzer
Learn more about Control-M
Sample Customers
LOHR, Carnival Cruise Lines, Herbalife, Digital Federal Credit Union, Synergent, Frandsen Bank & TrustPrimerica Financial ServicesCARFAX, ChipRewards, Sun Chemical, University of California, Unum
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm79%
Government6%
Insurance Company3%
Manufacturing Company3%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Insurance Company11%
Comms Service Provider8%
Financial Services Firm6%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm42%
Healthcare Company8%
Retailer8%
Comms Service Provider6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company49%
Comms Service Provider10%
Insurance Company7%
Financial Services Firm5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise42%
Large Enterprise39%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business30%
Midsize Enterprise36%
Large Enterprise34%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise75%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise85%
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, SMA Technologies, Stonebranch and others in Workload Automation. Updated: October 2020.
442,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
ASG-TMON Performance Analyzer is ranked 24th in Workload Automation while Control-M is ranked 1st in Workload Automation with 13 reviews. ASG-TMON Performance Analyzer is rated 0.0, while Control-M is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Control-M writes "File transfer module is quite advanced, this version has less need for written programs and is more GUI-based". ASG-TMON Performance Analyzer is most compared with , whereas Control-M is most compared with AutoSys Workload Automation, IBM Workload Automation, Ansible, Automic Workload Automation and ActiveBatch Workload Automation.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.