We performed a comparison between IBM FileNet and Mobius Content Services Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."The most useful feature is its persistent storage. Also, the full-text search and attribute searching are valuable."
"It has improved my organization by how we release documents, claims, and policies."
"The ability to tag data, as it seems to be indexed well. It is a good space to manage data, keep track of it, and organize it."
"The API's extensibility and new user interface are its most valuable features."
"FileNet has the capabilities to meet compliance and regulatory requirements. It is very secure."
"It has a robust API. We are able to have systems communicate with each other, and do business process automation."
"The document collaboration is very good. There is something called Pink Note where departments can collaborate within the document. It has a built-in viewer to see any type of document."
"The most valuable features are the interconnectivity and the collaboration. No longer do I have to wonder what system I need to go to for the data I need. I know it's in FileNet."
"It provides a single pane of glass for delivering content from multiple repositories. It is also highly recommended because of the ease of use when it comes to searching and retrieving from multiple repositories simultaneously."
"This solution has improved our organization by providing a central repository for business data with control over sensitive data."
"I would like to see Azure AD added."
"If there was more AI capability, into Watson, that would be a benefit."
"It needs better collaboration between the IBM teams on the FileNet and CCM sides."
"It is ability to display legacy content needs improvement."
"I know it took them seven months to convert, so the initial setup was, probably to some degree, complex."
"There is room for improvement in the scanning solution, Datacap. It's improving all the time. But since it's more an end-user software, the end-users are constantly improving their processes, and I believe that sometimes we're not catching up with their requirements."
"I would say the installation process can be very complicated, and you need to to have an experience resource."
"The FileNet API seems like it is very difficult and not transparent."
"Sales and service need to be more consistent."
"The setup and the support could be improved when it comes to populating the reports from a mainframe environment."
More Mobius Content Services Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM FileNet is ranked 5th in Enterprise Content Management with 94 reviews while Mobius Content Services Platform is ranked 12th in Enterprise Content Management with 3 reviews. IBM FileNet is rated 8.2, while Mobius Content Services Platform is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of IBM FileNet writes "A document management system that helps in document digitalization and workflow management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mobius Content Services Platform writes "Time from creation to access is much better, as reports are immediately available upon generation". IBM FileNet is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Documentum, OpenText Extended ECM, IBM ECM and Microsoft OneDrive, whereas Mobius Content Services Platform is most compared with IBM ECM, SharePoint, OpenText Extended ECM and Alfresco.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
