We performed a comparison between Laserfiche Rio and Mobius Content Services Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."This is a very complete and powerful solution."
"It provides a single pane of glass for delivering content from multiple repositories. It is also highly recommended because of the ease of use when it comes to searching and retrieving from multiple repositories simultaneously."
"This solution has improved our organization by providing a central repository for business data with control over sensitive data."
"We would like to see more features for RPA and AI."
"The setup and the support could be improved when it comes to populating the reports from a mainframe environment."
"Sales and service need to be more consistent."
More Mobius Content Services Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Laserfiche Rio is ranked 23rd in Enterprise Content Management while Mobius Content Services Platform is ranked 12th in Enterprise Content Management with 3 reviews. Laserfiche Rio is rated 10.0, while Mobius Content Services Platform is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Laserfiche Rio writes "A powerful solution that offers BPM and automation to assist with our digital transformation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mobius Content Services Platform writes "Time from creation to access is much better, as reports are immediately available upon generation". Laserfiche Rio is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText eDOCS and DocuWare, whereas Mobius Content Services Platform is most compared with IBM ECM, IBM FileNet, SharePoint, OpenText Extended ECM and Alfresco.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.