Compare ASG-Zena vs. Control-M

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpCon Logo
Read 38 OpCon reviews.
5,535 views|1,235 comparisons
ASG-Zena Logo
2,202 views|1,688 comparisons
Control-M Logo
31,504 views|13,517 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about ASG-Zena vs. Control-M and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
521,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Auto-scheduling is the most valuable feature. We have the ability to schedule [batch jobs on our Unisys mainframes] seven days in advance, so we know exactly how we're running every night.""The most valuable feature is the self-service because it has made it possible to provide simple and quick solutions in the handling of certain tasks.""Previously, we would receive a file from a vendor, then we would have to go through and make changes to individual accounts in our core system. There are probably between 10 to 20 accounts any given week. It probably took around five minutes for it to run through the report and make all the changes, and that was if there was nothing complicated with all very straightforward changes. Now, that is done in 30 seconds.""There are three features which are valuable: the automated calendar functions; the notification process for failed jobs or unscheduled events occurring, via email and text messaging; and the ability for the scheduling package to communicate across multiple platforms.""It has also helped to streamline our operations. We contract out our collection department so they are no longer housed on our system. They're housed on another platform. OpCon is able to not only pull in our data, but it also, on a daily basis, updates that third-party.""Manual processing has been automated 99 percent by OpCon. With new processes, we give it at least two weeks manual so we can write down the details of how to do the steps, then we automate it. Within a month, it has been automated, then it's no longer a manual process.""One of the advantages of OpCon is the ability to use the API and web services. We couldn't do that with our previous solution. We have been able to change our procedure for ticketing. When a job is down, we can immediately create a ticket from OpCon in our ticketing solution, which is ServiceNow, using the web services.""I have been pleased with the support that we can get from the European partners. I think they are very good. All the time, when we have a question, they have an answer. It is very reassuring to have that support every day. Then, you can concentrate on your job and OpCon is just there to work. For us, it's perfect."

More OpCon Pros »

"We haven't had any problems since we installed it. It runs as expected, we haven't had any critical problems. It helps keeps the business running 24/7.""I have found the scheduling feature the most valuable. I can map dependencies by using ASG-Zena. It gives a nice, quick visualization as to where things are."

More ASG-Zena Pros »

"BIM is a good tool to monitor SLAs, and being a financial organization, this is a very good feature for us.""Most of our tasks also deal with databases, and Control-M's purpose-built module for the databases comes in very handy when handling database components.""I find it very helpful to be able to keep track of all our help desk tickets.""The Automation API has opened up a world of possibilities for us, including the ability to create workflows on-demand using traditional DevOps tools.""It is very easy to use. The HA feature is also very good.""The solution has the power to reduce resources, which is good for business. It is constantly updated to remain compatible with new technologies such as Amazon, Azure, and Google Cloud. It's very easy to take advantage of the compatibilities.""Its compatibility with the new technologies and platforms, like the Google Cloud or Amazon, is the most valuable. Its console allows us to view the duration and execution of a process. It is also very easy to use and easy to implement.""The most valuable features are the GUI console, stability, and workflow."

More Control-M Pros »

Cons
"Do your first install, your first upgrade, with SMA. It's simple, it's as per the manual, as per the training, but you need that little bit of confidence.""The ability to retrieve information from logs in variables to display relevant information would be helpful.""What can get complicated is if you're doing anything more than just the built-in jobs. If you're using the more advanced features, troubleshooting becomes extremely complicated.""The calendar interface and the frequency interface is a very powerful, yet complex, section of OpCon in which all our staff have made mistakes. They have implemented what they believed was logically correct and then afterward discovered that their logic was flawed because OpCon did it a different way. That part, which is incredibly useful, is also incredibly dangerous. The interface or the ability to directly do more functions within the frequency definitely has room for expansion. As good as it is, it can be a lot better.""Usage is a little complex. It's not like you can bring somebody in and they can just use it. They have to be trained... As far as complexity goes, it's right up there.""There is some difficulty with the ease of use when I don't have some of the templates that were already created. More templates would be great. Non-core featured templates are my biggest struggle.""I would like to see them improve the Solution Manager for the web application. It's the future for us. Our customers need a lot of functionality, but there isn't that functionality within Solution Manager. So they have to develop and improve it.""It was hard to automate in the beginning because there were a lot of concepts. I had to learn a lot of things, as I never used such a software before. I learned a lot of the concepts and ideas behind it in the beginning."

More OpCon Cons »

"In the next release, I would like the user experience to be improved. The user interface should be more appealing to gen-z.""The scheduling mapping is a little disjointed. There is no wizard-type approach. There are a lot of different things that you have to do in completely different areas. They could probably add the functionality for creating all components of a mapping or an OPA schedule. The component creation could be done collectively rather than through individual components."

More ASG-Zena Cons »

"The Control-M API does not support SQL database-type jobs, where a job has been configured to use the SQL catalog to locate SSIS.""A developer sandbox could be very helpful to try out new features or experience them.""There's a lot of room for improvement and I think it can be more user-friendly.""The next major release needs to focus on the lightweight web client.""Its installation can be better. Currently, we have to install it manually. The file transfer feature can also be improved. It is not very easy to transfer a file from business to business. In terms of new features, they can include new technologies. It can have API integration.""The infrastructure could be improved.""Right now, Control-M is the leader in EMA analysis, which is similar to Gartner. However, clients want to invest in a strong technology, and therefore this product needs to keep up with the high expectations set for it.""Its operations and infrastructure can be improved."

More Control-M Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"This solution is certainly not the cheapest, but we win in time.""Yearly, it's around $30,000.""Our licensing is on a yearly basis.""Our license is for 1000 jobs. Including support, the license and upgrades are 2000 euros a month.""Yearly, we're paying about $62,000. OpCon has an all-inclusive feature and module license, but you pay per task.""Our annual maintenance costs are $45,000. The initial cost is separate.""On a yearly basis our cost is between $25,000 and $30,000.""Annually, we pay $29,000. This is for a blanket policy that covers everything, like licensing and support."

More OpCon Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"Licensing costs are around $3000 a year.""Pricing can be steep, but you get what you pay for.""The cost is basically $100 a job, give or take."

More Control-M Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
521,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: There are a lot of valuable features. The version that we're currently casting, Self Service, is going to be the most… more »
Top Answer: We currently renewed with one of their new technology bundles. It's around $36,000 annually. We run a query of our SQL… more »
Top Answer: Enterprise Manager is a little clunky which I know they're addressing in the solution's manager. It's annoying that our… more »
Top Answer: I have found the scheduling feature the most valuable. I can map dependencies by using ASG-Zena. It gives a nice, quick… more »
Top Answer: We use it across mainframe Linux and Windows environments for batch and full workflow dependency. We do a lot of ETLs… more »
Top Answer: It is a very stable product, and it has a long-term history of reliability. However, in our organization, we're moving… more »
Top Answer: Technical support is very helpful and available 24/7.
Top Answer: I can't speak to what our support costs are. That's out of my realm at this point. At one point, I had an idea, however… more »
Top Answer: I will say that at one time we used to run on Solaris and not Windows, however, we were taken over by a company that… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Control M
Learn More
Overview

OpCon is a robust and flexible platform capable of scaling up to meet the needs of clients running 140,000+ daily jobs across multiple environments and operating systems. Our proven migration framework helps clients painlessly transition from outdated or cost inefficient platforms thanks to our deep organizational expertise, REST API, and extensive library of legacy connectors. We have a variety of consulting options available for clients and offer no-cost training for the life of the contract.

ASG-Zena is a robust, enterprise-wide workload management solution for distributed operations environments that support “event-based” scheduling as well as traditional time and date-based scheduling methodologies.

ASG-Zena provides non-invasive integration of legacy applications, ERP, and newer, “message aware” environments such as .NET and J2EE that offer advanced IT process automation. From a single console, users can manage workloads and several scheduling points across multiple platforms, including Windows , as well as multiple UNIX and Linux operating environments and on the AS/400. ASG-Zena improves efficiency and reduces costs. It also offers exception-based management, a highly scalable component-based architecture, fault tolerance, role-based security, and graphical drag-and-drop workload definition. (https://www.asg.com/Smart-Catalog/ASG-Zena.aspx)

Control-M simplifies application and data workflow orchestration on premises or as a service. It makes it easy to build, define, schedule, manage, and monitor production workflows, ensuring visibility, reliability, and improving SLAs.

  • Accelerate new business applications into production—by embedding workflow orchestration into your CI/CD pipeline
  • Scale Dev and Ops collaboration, with a Jobs-as-Code approach
  • Simplify workflows across hybrid and multi-cloud environments with AWS, Azure and Google Cloud Platform integrations
  • Deliver data-driven outcomes faster, managing big data workflows in a scalable way
  • Take control of your file transfer operations with integrated, intelligent file movement and visibility
Offer
Accel­er­ate dig­i­tal trans­for­ma­tion through work­load automation

Automate repetitive tasks so you can focus on projects that drive your business forward. Find out how OpCon workload automation enables you to create repeatable, reliable workflows - all managed from a single platform.

Learn more about ASG-Zena
Learn more about Control-M
Sample Customers
LOHR, Carnival Cruise Lines, Herbalife, Digital Federal Credit Union, Synergent, Frandsen Bank & Trust
Fraternidad Muprespa
CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm76%
Government5%
Insurance Company5%
Manufacturing Company3%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Financial Services Firm17%
Insurance Company10%
Comms Service Provider9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Insurance Company19%
Financial Services Firm11%
Comms Service Provider9%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm37%
Computer Software Company11%
Retailer9%
Healthcare Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Financial Services Firm12%
Comms Service Provider10%
Insurance Company7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise43%
Large Enterprise36%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business45%
Midsize Enterprise28%
Large Enterprise27%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise75%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise74%
Find out what your peers are saying about ASG-Zena vs. Control-M and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
521,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.

ASG-Zena is ranked 10th in Workload Automation with 2 reviews while Control-M is ranked 1st in Workload Automation with 11 reviews. ASG-Zena is rated 9.0, while Control-M is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of ASG-Zena writes "A stable and reliable product that provides quick visualizations to see where things are". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Control-M writes "Easy to use, extremely stable, and offers excellent technical support". ASG-Zena is most compared with ASG-Zeke, IBM Workload Automation, AutoSys Workload Automation, Automic Workload Automation and Compuware ThruPut Manager, whereas Control-M is most compared with AutoSys Workload Automation, IBM Workload Automation, Automic Workload Automation, Ansible and ActiveBatch Workload Automation. See our ASG-Zena vs. Control-M report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.