We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"This framework is very easy to use and tweak for our business needs."
"ASP.NET works well with Windows applications and more generally, the Windows platform."
"The main pro is that it's very easy and we have Microsoft helping to stabilize the product which is coming with the all new features every year."
"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to use."
"The most valuable features are ease of use, scalability, and flexibility."
"What I like most about this solution, is that we can use it as a secondary customization platform."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the user-friendly interface and easy workflow."
"The workflow is the solution's most valuable feature."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The document filing system is the solution's most valuable feature. We have used SharePoint as an option for a document managed system, like Documentum and IBM Filenet."
"The new version doesn't have the option to view data, but it has other, better features though."
"The feature I find most valuable, is the workflow of the product."
"The most valuable part of the solution is its ability to allow for a high degree of customization."
"Sometimes we have issues with instability and it crashes, which is something that should be made to work better."
"In the future, I would like to see more AI and machine learning technologies made available in libraries."
"The con is that every year they are launching a new technology, and for a company like us, we get confused which version should be used."
"I am sure there is something that has room for improvement but nothing specific comes to mind."
"Performance is an area that can always be improved."
"There is zero technical support. I have to use Google to fix the issues myself."
"Further development for SharePoint online would be ideal. However, I'm not sure if it's true that Microsoft will no longer develop SharePoint Designer in the future or not."
"The solution is a bit complex. They should work to simplify it."
"The web services aspect of the solution is very weak."
"I believe Microsoft does not support Sharepoint on-premises. They only support Sharepoint on the Cloud. They should provide for both options and let the client choose their preference."
"I would like to be able to use SharePoint Designer without having to buy other third party programs."
"I am not sure how stable the solution will be once Microsoft stops supporting it."
"The solution is not scalable at all."
"The pricing is a bit high and I believe that it can be brought down."
"I've never paid for SharePoint Designer. What I paid for, is the SharePoint license, the cava, and then the client accesses the line fee."
"This solution is free of charge."
"The cost of the license is based on the size of the user base."
ASP.NET is ranked 3rd in .NET Development Services with 5 reviews while SharePoint Designer is ranked 2nd in .NET Development Services with 17 reviews. ASP.NET is rated 8.4, while SharePoint Designer is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of ASP.NET writes "Simple to maintain, design, and to create". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint Designer writes "Enables us to build workflow processes from end-to-end". ASP.NET is most compared with Microsoft Silverlight and Adobe Flash, whereas SharePoint Designer is most compared with Microsoft Visual Studio. See our ASP.NET vs. SharePoint Designer report.
See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.
We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.