Aspen Unified PIMS vs Cerner Millennium comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aspen Technology Logo
173 views|66 comparisons
Cerner Logo
834 views|30 comparisons
Ranking
8th
Views
173
Comparisons
66
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
4th
Views
834
Comparisons
30
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Aspen Technology PIMS, PIMS
Millennium
Learn More
Overview

Aspen Unified PIMS, the industry’s best production planning optimization solution, was recognized for building upon its proven, proprietary optimization engine with powerful new features from Unified like a streamlined interface, improved cloud support, and integration with two other award-winning technologies: AI modeling in Aspen Hybrid Models and dynamic optimization in Aspen GDOT. The solution is widely recognized in industry to help monitor and predict CO2 emissions while balancing overall operational efficiencies.

Millennium is a Web- and Java-based automated library system that integrates future-forward technologies.
Sample Customers
Westlake Chemical
Argenal Pediatrics, Cleveland Surgical Associates, Hampton Health, Raritan Family Healthcare, United Hospitalist Group, West Broadway Clinic

Aspen Unified PIMS is ranked 8th in Production Planning while Cerner Millennium is ranked 4th in Production Planning. Aspen Unified PIMS is rated 0.0, while Cerner Millennium is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Aspen Unified PIMS is most compared with , whereas Cerner Millennium is most compared with .

See our list of best Production Planning vendors.

We monitor all Production Planning reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.