• Home
  • Aspera Managed File Transfer vs. Flux

Aspera Managed File Transfer vs Flux comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo

Aspera Managed File Transfer

Read 3 Aspera Managed File Transfer reviews
1,105 views|745 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Flux Logo

Flux

Read 2 Flux reviews
82 views|72 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aspera Managed File Transfer and Flux based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Khaled AlKadi
An optimal solution for customers who want to transfer large files to remote sites with lower bandwidth and in less time
Anonymous User
User-friendly, extensible product with great customer support. Would like better support for multiple workflows.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Aspera Managed File Transfer is not an inexpensive solution. I am not aware of many competitors to determine how affordable the price is overall."

    • More Aspera Managed File Transfer Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Aspera Managed File Transfer?
    Top Answer:Aspera Managed File Transfer is an optimal solution for customers who want to transfer large files to remote sites with lower bandwidth and in less time.
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Aspera Managed File Transfer?
    Top Answer:The solution's pricing calculation needs revision to be more competitive
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What advice do you have for others considering Aspera Managed File Transfer?
    Top Answer:Aspera Managed File Transfer has superior technology. Overall, I rate Aspera Managed File Transfer a nine out of ten.
    Read all 3 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    13th
    out of 42 in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    Views
    1,105
    Comparisons
    745
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    151
    Rating
    9.0
    35th
    out of 42 in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    Views
    82
    Comparisons
    72
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    IBM
    Flux
    Overview
    The Aspera transfer platform is the the most advanced software solution for file transfer, synchronization and streaming of digital assets, allowing users and enterprises secure high speed movement of all of their data over any distance, to any environment, with none of the waiting. Covering a wide range of server, desktop and mobile operating systems, Aspera provides the most modern and flexible options as Software as a Service (SaaS), Run-your-own Software in the Cloud (single tenant), and On Premise Deployments.

    Flexible, integrated solution to meet highly complex processing needs with job scheduling, batch processor, and managed file transfer.

    Flux automates batch processes into comprehensive workflows. Flux's batch job scheduling runs reports, triggers database jobs, runs Java code, executes ETL processes, transfers files, and runs command lines or shell scripts. Flux integrates batch job scheduling, managed file transfer, database queries and stored procedures, web services, and error handling to automate your batch job scheduling needs.

    Sample Customers
    Gwinnett County Public Schools, Evonik, Voith, BITMARCK, Oracle
    MetLife DHL Express The Clearing House Payments Company ADP Bank of New York Mellon Conway, Inc Carnegie Mellon University
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Manufacturing Company16%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise76%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise80%
    Buyer's Guide
    Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Aspera Managed File Transfer is ranked 13th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) with 3 reviews while Flux is ranked 35th in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Aspera Managed File Transfer is rated 7.0, while Flux is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Aspera Managed File Transfer writes "Beneficial quick protocol, powerful, but limited use cases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Flux writes "User-friendly, extensible product with great customer support. Would like better support for multiple workflows". Aspera Managed File Transfer is most compared with IBM Sterling File Gateway, Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct, MOVEit and Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer, whereas Flux is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform.

    See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

    We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.