Compare Assyst vs. Micro Focus Service Manager

Assyst is ranked 12th in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 3 reviews while Micro Focus Service Manager is ranked 16th in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 2 reviews. Assyst is rated 8.0, while Micro Focus Service Manager is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Assyst writes "Excellent service catalog, good workflow, and great scalability capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Service Manager writes "Well-structured in modules but needs a lot of customization for ops management". Assyst is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Desk and Qualys Asset Inventory, whereas Micro Focus Service Manager is most compared with ServiceNow, BMC Helix ITSM and IBM Maximo. See our Assyst vs. Micro Focus Service Manager report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Assyst vs. Micro Focus Service Manager and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
379,343 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
XFlow (Temperature) and Service Point together provided an extremely user-friendly and collaborative experience to the point of making it easy for all users of the product, whether end-users or analysts.The most valuable features of this solution are reporting, configuration monitoring, and the Request and Incidents workflow.It has all our configurations. All our infrastructure configurations are on a single pane of glass to view, allowing for one single point of information.It helps when you have an incident or performing a problem change management process.We can search open and closed cases to find what we have done in other incidents.Being able to specify event rules and SLAs that can help to automate some of the processes that people are doing manually is valuable.The fact that it aligns very well with ITIL. I think that's probably one of my favorite things about it, because it's following up a general best practice for service management.the ticket system makes sure that everyone gets taken care of, and that makes for a better customer experience. Using the system verifies that no one gets left behind.

Read more »

The workflow of the solution is very good.We could quickly understand what was going on and what the customer wanted to do.

Read more »

It gives us better understanding and control of service management.It's pretty well-structured in modules.

Read more »

Cons
Diversifying notification methods with pop-ups or ready-made WhatsApp or Skype integration packages would be welcome.The monitoring tool is in need of improvement.The interface for the users is a bit old-fashioned and not user-friendly.We would like the CMDB to be populated automatically. At the moment, everything is manually created.We would like more information about all the configurations that we have on our infrastructure side.Needs custom dashboards, without them it takes too long to view some information (though xFlow is an improvement).I would also like to see a simpler reporting tool. They went from one fairly robust, very complex, reporting tool - it was great - and then they went to another one that was also fairly complex and robust. That's a great tool for people who are report writers, but for the average person who just wants to get a quick little report, it's like handing somebody a chainsaw because they have to break some toothpicks in half.The interface is pretty straightforward, but I think for some end-users a little more simplified user interface would help.

Read more »

Technical support could be improved.Some kind of bot assistance, some kind of artificial intelligence to help people solve the problems, would be interesting.

Read more »

Pure cloud-based native functionality is lacking.It needs good integration with the configuration database, that's lacking at the moment, It's not that good.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Licensing is on an annual basis, with no additional costs.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions are best for your needs.
379,343 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 47% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Also Known As
Unicenter Service Desk, CA SDM, CA Service Catalog, CA Business Service InsightHPE ITSM, HPE Service Manager
Learn
CA (A Broadcom Company)
Axios Systems
Micro Focus
Overview

Service desk capabilities, an integral part of the CA Service Management solution, can enable you to deliver efficiencies in IT service management to business consumers, power users and decision makers. Mobility and collaborative self-service capabilities provide a modern user experience for accessing services and performing tasks, which can help drive user adoption, satisfaction and productivity.

Learn More: https://www.ca.com/us/products...

Axios Systems is the world's leading provider of best practice IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions. Our assyst ITSM software, fully aligned to all ITIL processes, continually delivers business value to organizations worldwide. Our Service Catalogue product quickly and efficiently helps organizations manage their service hierarchy, with little resource required and gives end-to-end lifecycle management of services.

Service Manager on SaaS provides you with a cloud-based, industry leading IT Service Management solution.

Offer
Learn more about CA Service Desk Manager
Learn more about Assyst
Learn more about Micro Focus Service Manager
Sample Customers
Banco G&T Continental City of Perth, FEMSA, Fujitsu, Manpower, Muslim Commercial Bank - MCB, Punjab National Bank, Santa Clara County Social Services, StefaniniFedEx, Lego, Associated British Foods, Mamas & Papas, Arcadia, Mohawk, Edeka, William Grant & Sons, University of Canterbury, Forestry Commission, British Airways, Dudley, SRUCresultspositive, Globicon
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company29%
Financial Services Firm20%
Government8%
Transportation Company4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company26%
Insurance Company11%
Comms Service Provider10%
Financial Services Firm8%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm33%
Aerospace/Defense Firm13%
Government8%
Pharma/Biotech Company8%
Find out what your peers are saying about Assyst vs. Micro Focus Service Manager and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
379,343 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email