AT&T Platform as a Service vs Pantheon comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
AT&T Logo
153 views|124 comparisons
Pantheon Logo
497 views|436 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AT&T Platform as a Service and Pantheon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in PaaS Clouds.
To learn more, read our detailed PaaS Clouds Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use AT&T Platform as a Service?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The platform has reasonable pricing compared to other systems."
  • More Pantheon Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model.
    Top Answer:The platform has reasonable pricing compared to other systems.
    Top Answer:Pantheon's design is not familiar to use. It could be more user-friendly.
    Ranking
    27th
    out of 37 in PaaS Clouds
    Views
    153
    Comparisons
    124
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    20th
    out of 37 in PaaS Clouds
    Views
    497
    Comparisons
    436
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    295
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    AT&T Platform as a Service provides a complete development environment to build custom applications and bring them online more quickly than ever. Once launched, the service makes it easy to run, access and manage the applications and databases you create. As an AT&T Cloud Service, AT&T Platform as a Service also allows you to do all this at a low cost – while still providing the scale, performance or capacity you need.

    Pantheon is the world’s fastest hosting for Drupal and WordPress. It comes down to our super-efficient container-based platform. Multiple independent benchmarks have compared Pantheon with other providers, and we consistently come out on top.

    Sample Customers
    Golden Flake Snack Foods Inc., Dunn Tire, Road America, Committee on Arrangements
    Patch, Maine Today, Alley Interactice, Scranton Gillette, AdRoll, Cisco, nVidia, Boston Herald, Tableau, Dell, Kyriba, Huddle, IBM
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    University10%
    Government8%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    PaaS Clouds
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in PaaS Clouds. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AT&T Platform as a Service is ranked 27th in PaaS Clouds while Pantheon is ranked 20th in PaaS Clouds with 2 reviews. AT&T Platform as a Service is rated 0.0, while Pantheon is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pantheon writes "The product is user-friendly and performs well, but it is very costly compared to other tools". AT&T Platform as a Service is most compared with Engine Yard Cloud, whereas Pantheon is most compared with Amazon AWS, Acquia Cloud, Microsoft Azure, SAP Cloud Platform and Salesforce Platform.

    See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

    We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.