Compare AT&T Synaptic Storage as a Service vs. Gluster Cloud Backup

AT&T Synaptic Storage as a Service is ranked 34th in Cloud Backup while Gluster Cloud Backup is ranked 25th in Cloud Backup. AT&T Synaptic Storage as a Service is rated 0, while Gluster Cloud Backup is rated 0. On the other hand, AT&T Synaptic Storage as a Service is most compared with , whereas Gluster Cloud Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication and Acronis Backup.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
34th
out of 44 in Cloud Backup
Views
53
Comparisons
31
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
25th
out of 44 in Cloud Backup
Views
331
Comparisons
266
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, NetApp, Zerto and others in Cloud Backup. Updated: December 2019.
391,122 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
Synaptic Storage as a Service
Learn
AT&T
Gluster
Overview
AT&T Synaptic Storage as a Service provides secure, virtualized storage that adaptively scales to any size you need, and is accessible from virtually any device, anywhere.

GlusterFS is a scalable network filesystem suitable for data-intensive tasks such as cloud storage and media streaming. GlusterFS is free and open source software and can utilize common off-the-shelf hardware.

Offer
Learn more about AT&T Synaptic Storage as a Service
Learn more about Gluster Cloud Backup
Sample Customers
East Bay Regional Park DistrictRIS Belgium
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, NetApp, Zerto and others in Cloud Backup. Updated: December 2019.
391,122 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.