Compare Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Orchestra Networks EBX

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Ataccama ONE Platform? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, Microsoft, Orchestra Networks and others in Master Data Management. Updated: October 2020.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"I'm just involved in technical, but I understand that its pricing is similar to HP so it is quite expensive."

More Orchestra Networks EBX Pricing and Cost Advice »

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Master Data Management solutions are best for your needs.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The initial setup is easy and straightforward.
Top Answer: The solution is not that expensive because we use JavaScript sometimes for specific developments.
Top Answer: Sometimes it is a little difficult to find an architect for certain developments. You kind of have to be like technicians to work with this product if you want to make some specific development. So… more »
Average Words per Review
Avg. Rating
Average Words per Review
Avg. Rating
Popular Comparisons
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
EBX, EBX.Platform, Orchestra Networks EBX5
Orchestra Networks
Video Not Available

Ataccama ONE is a robust, AI-powered platform integrating Data Discovery & Profiling, Metadata Management (incl. a Data Catalog and Business Glossary), Data Quality Management, Master Data Management & Reference Data Management, Data Preparation, Big Data Processing & Data Integration. Ataccama ONE gives you the option to start with what you need and seamlessly extend as your business requires. The first step is free—try our one-click data profiling trusted by 55,000 users globally at

EBX5 makes it easier to manage your data assets. Custom applications and purpose-built MDM solutions are hard to change while EBX5 is flexible and agile. EBX5 uses a unique what-you-model-is-what-you-get design approach: with applications generated on the fly and fully configurable. This eliminates the need for long, costly, and endless development projects. And EBX5 includes all the enterprise-class capabilities you need to create data-driven applications. Data stewardship, workflow, data quality and data integration are built right in.
Learn more about Ataccama ONE Platform
Learn more about Orchestra Networks EBX
Sample Customers
Société Générale, First Data, Raiffeisenbank International, T-Mobile, Avast, RSA, Toronto Public LibraryUnited Technologies Corporation
Top Industries
No Data Available
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider14%
Insurance Company9%
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, Microsoft, Orchestra Networks and others in Master Data Management. Updated: October 2020.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ataccama ONE Platform is ranked 16th in Master Data Management while Orchestra Networks EBX is ranked 3rd in Master Data Management with 3 reviews. Ataccama ONE Platform is rated 0.0, while Orchestra Networks EBX is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Orchestra Networks EBX writes "The support is fast and good, and the program is user-friendly". Ataccama ONE Platform is most compared with Collibra Governance, Informatica Data Quality, Alation Data Catalog, Collibra Lineage and Microsoft MDS, whereas Orchestra Networks EBX is most compared with Informatica MDM, TIBCO EBX, SAP Master Data Governance, Reltio Cloud and Microsoft MDS.

See our list of best Master Data Management vendors.

We monitor all Master Data Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.