We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Aternity AppInternals vs. Elastic APM

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Aternity AppInternals vs. Elastic APM and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
540,984 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is the integration with their other systems. It's easy to understand and it points out the relevant problems in the enterprise.""As an Administrator, before we bought this AppInternals, I didn't have visibility on why items were slow or why an application was not running. This gives us the ability to see what's going on. The application is load balancing. We can now see if its own server has issues or just one specific server has issues."

More Aternity AppInternals Pros »

"The price is very less expensive compared to the other solutions.""We use AppDynamics and Elastic. The reason why we're using Elastic APM is because of the license count. It's very favorable compared to AppDynamics. It's inexpensive; it's economical.""For full stack observability, Elastic is the best tool compared with any other tool ."

More Elastic APM Pros »

Cons
"I would like for it to have automated updates, the way the product updates itself should be all automated, as opposed to what it is now.""It would be great if the solution could offer fixed bundles and more features."

More Aternity AppInternals Cons »

"The solution would be better if it was capable of more automation, especially in a monitoring capacity or for the response to abnormalities.""The auto-discovery isn't nearly as good. That's a big portion of it. When you drop the agent onto the JVM and you're trying to figure things out, having to go through and manually do all that is cumbersome.""Elastic APM's visualization is not that great compared to other tools. It's number of metrics is very low."

More Elastic APM Cons »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Management (APM) solutions are best for your needs.
540,984 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Hi @KhalidOmer , @Kashif Asrar Khan, @DonaldBakels, @Fazal Azeem, @Aklilu Shifera,  @Drew Thornton ​and  @Zarko Dmitrovic, Would you mind joining this discussion and sharing your professional… more »
Top Answer: We use AppDynamics and Elastic. The reason why we're using Elastic APM is because of the license count. It's very favorable compared to AppDynamics. It's inexpensive; it's economical.
Top Answer: The auto-discovery isn't nearly as good. That's a big portion of it. When you drop the agent onto the JVM and you're trying to figure things out, having to go through and manually do all that is… more »
Top Answer: We use it for monitoring the application performance and development.
Ranking
Views
1,063
Comparisons
781
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
488
Rating
7.0
Views
4,744
Comparisons
3,717
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
852
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
SteelCentral AppInternals, OPNET ACE, AppInternals Xpert
Learn More
Overview

Simplified high-definition monitoring that is scalable, easy to use and deploy, and unifies APM visibility across end users, applications, networks, and the cloud-native ecosystem.

Elastic APM is an application performance monitoring system built on the Elastic Stack. It allows you to monitor software services and applications in real time — collect detailed performance information on response time for incoming requests, database queries, calls to caches, external HTTP requests, and more. This makes it easy to pinpoint and fix performance problems quickly.

Elastic APM also automatically collects unhandled errors and exceptions. Errors are grouped based primarily on the stacktrace, so you can identify new errors as they appear and keep an eye on how many times specific errors happen.

Offer
Learn more about Aternity AppInternals
Learn more about Elastic APM
Sample Customers
National Instruments, Allianz
PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider29%
Healthcare Company14%
Government14%
Media Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm10%
Healthcare Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider22%
Financial Services Firm13%
Manufacturing Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise70%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Aternity AppInternals vs. Elastic APM and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
540,984 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Aternity AppInternals is ranked 33rd in Application Performance Management (APM) with 2 reviews while Elastic APM is ranked 14th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 3 reviews. Aternity AppInternals is rated 7.0, while Elastic APM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aternity AppInternals writes "Great for visibility but lacks many features and difficult to update". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Elastic APM writes "The best full stack observability compared to any other tool". Aternity AppInternals is most compared with AppDynamics, Aternity, Dynatrace, Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope and Azure Monitor, whereas Elastic APM is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, New Relic Browser, AppDynamics and AWS X-Ray. See our Aternity AppInternals vs. Elastic APM report.

See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.